Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1772T>C(p.Ile591Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000041 in 1,461,684 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I591M) has been classified as Likely benign.
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
BP4
?
BP4 - Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.38131168).
BP6
?
BP6 - Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation
Variant 17-43093759-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093759-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 54345.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr17-43093759-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Apr 08, 2022
- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
curation
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Mar 23, 2023
Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Nov 06, 2018
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
May 01, 2022
- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Sep 15, 2022
The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000008 (2/251098 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 25777348 (2015), 22476429 (2012)) and individuals with glioblastomas (PMID: 26933808 (20016)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Oct 30, 2017
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Oct 01, 2018
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.1772T>C (p.Ile591Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 245912 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1772T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and all classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance until additional information becomes available. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)
Dec 23, 2003
- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Oct 27, 2011
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Apr 02, 2024
- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter