rs80356994
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.19C>T(p.Arg7Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,308 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R7R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.19C>T | p.Arg7Cys | missense_variant | 2/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.19C>T | p.Arg7Cys | missense_variant | 2/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251054Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135680
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000219 AC: 32AN: 1461164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 726934
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74330
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Jul 25, 2011 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 19, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Mar 15, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 04, 2017 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 03, 2023 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.19C>T (p.Arg7Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 251176 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.19C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (examples- Gonzalez_2011, Keshvarzi_2012, Solano_2012). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant, suggesting a benign functional effect (examples Starita_2015, Bouwman_2020), and has been reported to not have an effect on splicing (Wai_2020). The variant has also been reported to have normal binding to BARD1 and E2, and have normal levels of E3 ligase activity (Morris_2006). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 32546644, 20683152, 35659930, 30209399, 20859677, 34981296, 16267036, 21918854, 16403807, 23192404, 23961350, 25823446, 32123317). Seven other submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, citing the variant with a majority consensus as as likely benign (n=6) and uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 21, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20859677, 23961350, 26109977, 11573085, 23192404, 21918854, 32123317, 22684231, 16403807, 24312913, 25823446, 30209399, 31131967) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 05, 2023 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 05, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Arg7Cys variant was identified in 5 of 516 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0097) from Argentinean, Iranian and Algerian individuals or families with HBOC (Cherbal 2012, Solano 2012, Keshavarzi 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80356994) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Color, Invitae, Quest Diagnostics, SCRP, and True Health Diagnostics; as uncertain significance by Queen's University and BIC), LOVD 3.0 (3 submissions, classified as does not affect function and effect unknown), UMD-LSDB (classified as a probable polymorphism).The variant was identified in control databases in 6 of 245822 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European Non-Finnish in 6 of 111308 chromosomes (freq: 0.000054), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. In a yeast two-hybrid ubiquitin ligase assay this variant showed E2 and BARD1 binding and E3 ligase activity equivalent to wild type function (Morris 2006). In a massively parallel functional analysis of BRCA1 RING domain variants, this variant showed no binding defect with BARD1 and was able to rescue homology-directed DNA repair but it performed poorly in the E3 ligase selections; however, it may retain enough E3 ligase activity to satisfy a possibly low threshold of requisite activity and was classified as benign (Starita 2015). The p.Arg7 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 27, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at