rs80357015
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1036C>T(p.Pro346Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000211 in 1,613,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.1036C>T | p.Pro346Ser | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.1036C>T | p.Pro346Ser | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000175 AC: 44AN: 251230Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 18AN XY: 135796
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1461648Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74326
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Sep 18, 2010 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 10, 2017 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 18, 2019 | Variant allele has low bioinformatic likelihood to encode a missense alteration affecting protein function (Missense prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND minor allele frequency 0.00281 (East Asian), derived from gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer (2019-05-13). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Feb 13, 2012 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 11, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.1036C>T (p.Pro346Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA1, serine-rich domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 282696 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0027 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.1036C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (Kuo_2012, Sun_2014, Thirthagiri_2008, Flower_2015, Chao_2016, Lai_2017, Chan_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Additionally, multifactorial likelihood analysis classified this variant as neutral (Bouwman_2020). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=1), likely benign (n=3) and benign (n=5), including one expert panel (ENIGMA) classified it as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 30, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 22, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Sep 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 03, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 04, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 12, 2019 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Pro346Ser variant was identified in 3 of 482 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from Taiwanese and Malaysian individuals or families with breast cancer, early onset breast cancer or a family history of breast and ovarian cancer (Li 1999, Kuo 2012, Thirthagiri 2008). In these studies, the variant was considered a polymorphism, found to co-occur with a pathogenic BRCA2 mutation (exon 3: 490 delCT/STOP 99) in one proband and linkage was not established in another. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80357015) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; benign by Invitae and SCRP (Sharing Clinical Reports Project); likely benign by Ambry Genetics and GeneDx; and uncertain significance by BIC)), Clinvitae (5X), LOVD 3.0 (2x), UMD-LSDB (2-Likely Neutral), BIC Database (4X, unknown clinical importance, classification pending), and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (2x); but was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, and ARUP Laboratories databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 49 of 276996 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 in the following population: East Asian in 49 of 18868 chromosomes (freq. 0.0025), increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Pro346 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at