rs80357275
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):āc.455T>Cā(p.Leu152Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,612,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
2
4
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.11
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13944432).
BP6
Variant 17-43099867-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43099867-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 55227.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=5}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.455T>C | p.Leu152Pro | missense_variant | 7/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.455T>C | p.Leu152Pro | missense_variant | 7/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251430Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135884
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
251430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135884
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1460490Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000826 AC XY: 6AN XY: 726666
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
1460490
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
726666
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74364
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 22, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 16, 2022 | The p.L152P variant (also known as c.455T>C), located in coding exon 6 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 455. The leucine at codon 152 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. One study using two different in silico prediction methods, SIFT and Ancestral Sequence (AS) method, predicted this alteration as deleterious (Pavlicek A et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004 Nov;13:2737-51). In a computational study utilizing fifteen mutation effect prediction algorithms, this alteration was classified as uncertain (Martelotto LG et al. Genome Biol., 2014 Oct;15:484). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 24, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 152 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A high-throughput homology-directed DNA repair assay found that this variant protein performed similarly to a neutral missense, p.Asp67Gly (PMID: 30219179). This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_002213). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on co-occurrence with a pathogenic covariant and family history of 1.1026 and 0.228, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 2/251430 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Jan 31, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 23, 2019 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.455T>C (p.Leu152Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251430 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.455T>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has internally been reported (PALB2 c.2386G>T, p.Gly296X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Two ClinVar submissions (evalulation after 2014) cites the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Dec 23, 2003 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 04, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 152 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A high-throughput homology-directed DNA repair assay found that this variant protein performed similarly to a neutral missense, p.Asp67Gly (PMID: 30219179). This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_002213). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on co-occurrence with a pathogenic covariant and family history of 1.1026 and 0.228, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 2/251430 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2021 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30219179, 31131967, 10923033) - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 02, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;D;D;T;D;T;D;T;T;D;T;.;D;T;D;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;D;D;D;D;T;.;.;D;.;D;.;D;.;D;.
Polyphen
1.0, 0.42, 0.24, 0.78
.;D;.;.;.;B;.;B;.;.;P;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);.;Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);.;.;.;.;Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);.;Gain of glycosylation at L152 (P = 0.0555);.;
MVP
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at