rs80357325

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.508C>T(p.Arg170Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000123 in 1,461,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:9B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.685

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08125824).

BP6

Variant 17-43099814-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43099814-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 55393.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43099814-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.508C>T	p.Arg170Trp	missense_variant	7/23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.508C>T	p.Arg170Trp	missense_variant	7/23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283	P4	P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000119

AC:

AN:

251458

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

135900

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000123

AC:

AN:

1461236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

726996

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000117

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:3

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health	Jan 11, 2024	This missense variant replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 170 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373).Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 in on growth and homology-directed DNA repair assays in mouse Brca1-null embryonic stem cells (PMID: 23867111, 32546644). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001411). This variant also has been reported in a breast cancer case-control study and a pancreatic cancer case-control study in which this variant is absent in cases and found only in one unaffected individual in the control cohort (PMID: 30287823, 32980694). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on tumor pathology, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant and family history of 0.544, 1.0673, 0.0641, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 3/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)	Nov 25, 2004	- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panel	curation	Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)	Jun 18, 2019	IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000759 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Jan 18, 2017	- -

not provided

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	May 03, 2019	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 21, 2023	Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect to cell growth, ubiquitination, or sensitivity to cisplatin (PMID: 23867111, 25823446, 32546644); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 627C>T; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 23983145, 23867111, 30287823, 33087888, Rodriguez2013[CaseReport], 25823446, 31112341, 33471991, 36243179, 32546644, 20215511, 25186627, 31131967) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Jun 01, 2023	The p.R170W variant (also known as c.508C>T), located in coding exon 6 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 508. The arginine at codon 170 is replaced by tryptophan, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. Functional analysis of this alteration using cDNA-based functional complementation assays in mouse embryonic stem cells demonstrated that this alteration resulted in similar proliferation rates as wildtype, and was not deleterious based on cisplatin sensitivity assays (Bouwman P et al. Cancer Discov 2013 Oct; 3(10):1142-55). This alteration was not observed in unselected male breast cancer patients but was observed with an allele frequency of 0.0001 in 12490 male controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun, 2018 10;9:4083). This variant was also reported in 2/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 0/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Oct 05, 2023	This missense variant replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 170 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373).Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 in on growth and homology-directed DNA repair assays in mouse Brca1-null embryonic stem cells (PMID: 23867111, 32546644). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001411). This variant also has been reported in a breast cancer case-control study and a pancreatic cancer case-control study in which this variant is absent in cases and found only in one unaffected individual in the control cohort (PMID: 30287823, 32980694). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on tumor pathology, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant and family history of 0.544, 1.0673, 0.0641, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 3/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 10, 2020	Variant summary: BRCA1 c.508C>T (p.Arg170Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251458 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.508C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example, Tung_2014) as well as an unaffected Japanese male control (Momozawa_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Bouwman_2013). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant based on cisplatin response. A recent report from the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) challenge has classified this variant as benign in a prediction protocol that includes assessment of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function using four sets of predictors (Padilla_2019). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All clinical diagnostic laboratories classify the variant as VUS while the expert panel has settled upon a definitive classification as Benign based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis (Plon_2008). Based on the evidence outlined above, until the consensus interpretation converges to a neutral/benign outcome, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Feb 06, 2024	- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Dec 25, 2023

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.091

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.020

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.11

.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T;.;T;T;.;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.95

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.83

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.054

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.087

MetaRNN

Benign

0.081

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.074

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.69

N;N;N;N;.;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.23

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

N;N;N;D;N;D;N;N;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.48

Sift

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D;T;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;T;.;D;T;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.015

D;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;D;.;T;.;D;.;D;.

Polyphen

0.0, 0.0010

.;B;.;.;.;B;.;B;.;.;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.27

MutPred

0.41

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);.;.;.;.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.0062);.;

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.084

ClinPred

0.16

GERP RS

1.8

Varity_R

0.036

gMVP

0.25

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over