rs80357325
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.508C>T(p.Arg170Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000123 in 1,461,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R170Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.508C>T | p.Arg170Trp | missense_variant | 7/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.508C>T | p.Arg170Trp | missense_variant | 7/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251458Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135900
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000123 AC: 18AN: 1461236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 726996
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 18, 2019 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000759 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jan 11, 2024 | This missense variant replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 170 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373).Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 in on growth and homology-directed DNA repair assays in mouse Brca1-null embryonic stem cells (PMID: 23867111, 32546644). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001411). This variant also has been reported in a breast cancer case-control study and a pancreatic cancer case-control study in which this variant is absent in cases and found only in one unaffected individual in the control cohort (PMID: 30287823, 32980694). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on tumor pathology, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant and family history of 0.544, 1.0673, 0.0641, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 3/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Nov 25, 2004 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jan 18, 2017 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 10, 2021 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history including breast and ovarian cancers (Tung 2015); Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect to cell growth, ubiquitination, or sensitivity to cisplatin (Bouwman 2013, Starita 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23867111, 25823446, 25186627, 30287823, 33087888, 23983145, 10923033, Rodriguez2013[CaseReport], 31131967) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 03, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 01, 2023 | The p.R170W variant (also known as c.508C>T), located in coding exon 6 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 508. The arginine at codon 170 is replaced by tryptophan, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. Functional analysis of this alteration using cDNA-based functional complementation assays in mouse embryonic stem cells demonstrated that this alteration resulted in similar proliferation rates as wildtype, and was not deleterious based on cisplatin sensitivity assays (Bouwman P et al. Cancer Discov 2013 Oct; 3(10):1142-55). This alteration was not observed in unselected male breast cancer patients but was observed with an allele frequency of 0.0001 in 12490 male controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun, 2018 10;9:4083). This variant was also reported in 2/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 0/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 05, 2023 | This missense variant replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 170 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373).Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 in on growth and homology-directed DNA repair assays in mouse Brca1-null embryonic stem cells (PMID: 23867111, 32546644). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25186627) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 2/60466 cases and 0/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001411). This variant also has been reported in a breast cancer case-control study and a pancreatic cancer case-control study in which this variant is absent in cases and found only in one unaffected individual in the control cohort (PMID: 30287823, 32980694). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on tumor pathology, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant and family history of 0.544, 1.0673, 0.0641, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 3/251458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 10, 2020 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.508C>T (p.Arg170Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 251458 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.508C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (example, Tung_2014) as well as an unaffected Japanese male control (Momozawa_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Bouwman_2013). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant based on cisplatin response. A recent report from the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) challenge has classified this variant as benign in a prediction protocol that includes assessment of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function using four sets of predictors (Padilla_2019). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All clinical diagnostic laboratories classify the variant as VUS while the expert panel has settled upon a definitive classification as Benign based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis (Plon_2008). Based on the evidence outlined above, until the consensus interpretation converges to a neutral/benign outcome, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 25, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at