rs80357480
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2662C>T(p.His888Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.2662C>T | p.His888Tyr | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.2662C>T | p.His888Tyr | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251050Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135680
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 39AN: 1461666Hom.: 0 Cov.: 49 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727126
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74306
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 27, 2024 | Observed in individuals with familial breast cancer or other history warranting hereditary cancer testing (PMID: 12938098, 16267036, 18176857, 29088781, 28477318, 27616075, 31159747, 33471991); Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: homologous recombination repair activity comparable to wild-type (PMID: 32546644); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as 2781C>T; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16267036, 12938098, 28477318, 18176857, 15385441, 27616075, 29088781, 26206375, 25348012, 22144684, 24393486, 31159747, 31294896, 31131967, 31112341, 34597585, 32377563, 33875564, 29884841, 10923033, 31911673, 33630411, 33471991, 34981296, 32546644, 15343273, 38725546) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Oct 18, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Nov 30, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 05, 2024 | The BRCA2 c.2662C>T (p.His888Tyr) variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 34981296 (2022), 31159747 (2019), 29088781 (2017), 28477318 (2017), 27616075 (2016), 18176857 (2008), 12938098 (2003)). This variant has also been identified in individuals with breast cancer as well as reportedly healthy individuals in a large-scale breast cancer association study (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA1)). A published functional study has reported that this variant does not have a deleterious effect on BRCA1 protein function (PMID: 32546644 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000035 (4/113480 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 07, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Aug 01, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 28, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 11, 2024 | The p.H888Y variant (also known as c.2662C>T), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2662. The histidine at codon 888 is replaced by tyrosine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported in multiple ethnically diverse patients/families with suspected hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (Meyer P et al. Hum. Mutat. 2003 Sep; 22(3):259; Miramar MD et al. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008 Nov; 112(2):353-8; Alvarez C et al. Oncotarget. 2017 Sep;8:74233-74243; Gabaldó Barrios X et al. Fam Cancer. 2017 10;16:477-489; Tsaousis GN et al. BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun;19:535). In one study, this variant was reported in 4/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 3/53,461 controls (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Dec 23, 2003 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Feb 19, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Apr 09, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 29, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 20, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2662C>T (p.His888Tyr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. A recent report from the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) challenge has classified this variant as Class 2 (Likely not pathogenic) in a prediction protocol that includes assessment of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function using four sets of predictors (Padilla_2019). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251050 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2662C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer or colorectal cancer (example, Judkins 2005, Meyer 2003, Miramar 2008, Kraus 2016, Alvarez 2017, Gabaldo 2017, Tsaousis_2019, Ferrer-Avargues_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (UMD database - BRCA2 c.5073dup, p.Trp1692MetfsX3; Ferrer-Avargues_2021 - MSH6 c.3996_4000dup, p.Arg1334HisfsTer), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function in a homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) complementation assay (example, Bouwman_2020). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Benign/Likely Benign, n=2; VUS, n=8). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at