rs80358014
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.548-17G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000289 in 1,606,792 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 intron
NM_007294.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.773
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 17-43097306-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43097306-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37675.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43097306-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.548-17G>T | intron_variant | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.548-17G>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 151628Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
151628
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000208 AC: 52AN: 249716Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000170 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135406
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
249716
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135406
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000291 AC: 423AN: 1455046Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 204AN XY: 724256
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
423
AN:
1455046
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
204
AN XY:
724256
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 151746Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74118
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
151746
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74118
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000319 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of North Norway | May 01, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 06, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Apr 17, 2009 | - - |
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 24, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 28, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 07, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA1 c.548-17G>T variant causing the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide with 5/5 in silico programs predicting no significant effect on splicing, which is supported by multiple functional studies. This variant was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 20/119928 (1/5995, frequency: 0.0001668), which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic BRCA1 variant of 1/1000 (0.0010005). The variant of interest has been reported in multiple affected individuals via publications with limited information (ie, lack of co-occurrence and cosegregation data). However, the variant has been reported to co-occur with other pathogenic variants, BRCA1, c.2722G>T and BRCA2 variants, c.8237_8238delCA (p.Thr2736SerfsX17), c.2930_2940del and c.1202C>A (p.Ser401X). In addition, multiple publications and reputable databases/clinical laboratories cite the variant as "Benign/Neutral." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 c.548-17G>T variant was identified in ClinVar (Bengin. Classified as benign by ENIGMA, Prevention Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl, ARUP Laboratories, Integrated Genetics, GeneDx, Centre for Mendelian Genomics at University Medical Centre Ljubljana, SCRP. Classified as likely benign by Department of Medical Genetics at University Hospital North Norway, COGR. Classified as VUS by BIC). The variant was identified in dnSNP (rs80358014). The variant has been reporting as co-occuring with pathogenic variants (BRCA1, c.2722G>T and BRCA2 variants, c.8237_8238delCA (p.Thr2736SerfsX17), c.2930_2940del and c.1202C>A (p.Ser401X), SCV000699264.1). The variant was identified in control databases in 59 of 280930 chromosomes (0 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0002100 and was observed at the highest frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population in 47 of 128348 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003662) (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1).The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (Splice AI exome) do not predict a deleterious effect on splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 23, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 23, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Oct 17, 2019 | This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BP6,BP4. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at