rs80358111

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.4358-10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000242 in 1,612,410 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.9916
1

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.61
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 17-43076624-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43076624-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 125710.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-43076624-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkc.4358-10C>T intron_variant Intron 12 of 22 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1 P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkc.4358-10C>T intron_variant Intron 12 of 22 1 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3 P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152058
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000853
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000319
AC:
80
AN:
250454
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000273
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
135406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000300
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000242
AC:
354
AN:
1460234
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000223
AC XY:
162
AN XY:
726486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000189
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000253
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000269
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000852
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000224
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000268

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1 c.4358-10C>T variant was identified in 7 of 5548 proband chromosomes from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer and was not identified in 200 control chromosomes from these studies (Borg 2010, Diez 2003, Konstantopoulou 2008). This variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs80358111) “With untested allele”, LOVD, UMD (14X as a neutral variant), and BIC (25X with no clinical importance). In UMD, this variant was twice reported to co-occur with known pathogenic mutations (BRCA1 c.4195_4196delAC (p.Thr1399HisfsX4) and BRCA2 c.IVS12+594T>G (c.6937+594T>G)), increasing the likelihood that it does not have clinical significance. Furthermore, Judkins (2005) identified the c.4358-10C>T variant residing in trans with a known deleterious mutation in BRCA1, and Konstantopoulou (2008) identified the variant in a homozygous state in one individual, suggesting that this variant is not associated with disease as there is strong evidence that biallelic BRCA1 deleterious mutations result in embryonic lethality. The variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions; however, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In-silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict any change in splicing for this variant but this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 04, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:4
Oct 31, 2014
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided Benign:4
Mar 28, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant Summary: The c.4358-10C>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in an intronic change. 5/5 in silico tools via Alamut predict no significant effect on splicing and an in vitro assay showed evidence that the variant does not affect splicing (Houdayer_2012). The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.023%, predominantly in individuals of Europeand and Latino origin (0.035%). The variant has been reported to co-occur with a different deleterious BRCA1/2 variants suggesting a non-pathogenic nature of this variant. Additionally, the variant has been reported in the homozygous state further supporting neutrality. Lastly, several reputable databases and clinical diagnostic labs have classifed the variant as "Benign". Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

Sep 24, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2018
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA1: BP4 -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2019
Hereditary Cancer Genetics group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 11, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jan 31, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Oct 21, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Aug 09, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
0.99
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358111; hg19: chr17-41228641; COSMIC: COSV58791536; COSMIC: COSV58791536; API