rs80358198

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_000147.5(FUCA1):c.648C>T(p.Tyr216Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00033 in 1,613,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FUCA1
NM_000147.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.160

Publications

8 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FUCA1 (HGNC:4006): (alpha-L-fucosidase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal enzyme involved in the degradation of fucose-containing glycoproteins and glycolipids. Mutations in this gene are associated with fucosidosis (FUCA1D), which is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease. A pseudogene of this locus is present on chr 2.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

FUCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

fucosidosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen

FUCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 1-23863148-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-23863148-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 767042.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.16 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00126 (191/152186) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00347 (144/41508). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00301. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 106 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FUCA1	NM_000147.5 link	c.648C>T	p.Tyr216Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 8	ENST00000374479.4	NP_000138.2	P04066

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FUCA1	ENST00000374479.4 link	c.648C>T	p.Tyr216Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 8	1	NM_000147.5	ENSP00000363603.3		P04066

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

190

AN:

152068

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000481

AC:

121

AN:

251326

AF XY:

0.000390

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00388

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000838

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000928

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000233

AC:

341

AN:

1461580

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000213

AC XY:

155

AN XY:

727096

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00338

AC:

113

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000872

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26128

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39672

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000113

AC:

AN:

53224

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000123

AC:

137

AN:

1111952

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

101

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00126

AC:

191

AN:

152186

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00142

AC XY:

106

AN XY:

74412

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00347

AC:

144

AN:

41508

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00209

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10582

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

AN:

68006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.519

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000235

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00139

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fucosidosis

Benign:2

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

0.48

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.27

PhyloP100

-0.16

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over