rs80358269

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_004700.4(KCNQ4):​c.648C>T​(p.Arg216Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000028 in 1,606,864 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KCNQ4
NM_004700.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.20
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNQ4 (HGNC:6298): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 4) The protein encoded by this gene forms a potassium channel that is thought to play a critical role in the regulation of neuronal excitability, particularly in sensory cells of the cochlea. The current generated by this channel is inhibited by M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and activated by retigabine, a novel anti-convulsant drug. The encoded protein can form a homomultimeric potassium channel or possibly a heteromultimeric channel in association with the protein encoded by the KCNQ3 gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness type 2 (DFNA2), an autosomal dominant form of progressive hearing loss. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 1-40818620-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-40818620-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 21425.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1, Benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000525 (8/152332) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00136 (7/5162). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000636. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KCNQ4NM_004700.4 linkc.648C>T p.Arg216Arg synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 14 ENST00000347132.10 NP_004691.2 P56696-1B3KQH8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCNQ4ENST00000347132.10 linkc.648C>T p.Arg216Arg synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 14 1 NM_004700.4 ENSP00000262916.6 P56696-1
KCNQ4ENST00000509682.6 linkc.648C>T p.Arg216Arg synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 13 5 ENSP00000423756.2 P56696-2
KCNQ4ENST00000443478.3 linkc.333C>T p.Arg111Arg synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 13 5 ENSP00000406735.3 H0Y6N7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000171
AC:
41
AN:
239102
AF XY:
0.000129
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000254
AC:
37
AN:
1454532
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.0000207
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
723910
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33452
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44640
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26086
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000857
AC:
34
AN:
39666
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86152
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
47192
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.00e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1111526
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.0000166
AC:
1
AN:
60258
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152332
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000537
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00136
AC:
0.00135606
AN:
0.00135606
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
AC:
0.000473037
AN:
0.000473037
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000586
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jul 19, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Observed in a patient with hearing loss in published literature (Su et al., 2007); In silico analysis suggests this variant may impact gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17033161, 30245029, 20301388, 31434872, 24616153) -

Jan 06, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 2A Benign:1Other:1
-
GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.96
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.42
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.42
Position offset: -6

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358269; hg19: chr1-41284292; API