rs80358335

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 1P and 1B. PM4_SupportingBP6

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.3328_3330del​(p.Lys1110del) variant causes a inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000164 in 1,612,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 inframe_deletion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.372
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM4
Nonframeshift variant in NON repetitive region in NM_007294.4. Strenght limited to Supporting due to length of the change: 1aa.
BP6
Variant 17-43092200-GCTT-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43092200-GCTT-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 54840.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=6, Benign=2}. Variant chr17-43092200-GCTT-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3328_3330del p.Lys1110del inframe_deletion 10/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3328_3330del p.Lys1110del inframe_deletion 10/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000396
AC:
99
AN:
250222
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000583
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
135406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00324
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000175
AC:
256
AN:
1460900
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000283
AC XY:
206
AN XY:
726756
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152092
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000808
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74292
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 14, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2023BRCA1: PM4:Supporting, BS3:Supporting, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 05, 2019The BRCA1 c.3328_3330delAAG; p.Lys1110del variant (rs80358335) is reported in the literature in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Ahmad 2012, Mannan 2016, Mehta 2018), and is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 54840). This variant is found in the South Asian population with an allele frequency of 0.3% (99/30598 alleles, including 1 homozygote) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The lysine at codon 1110 is not highly conserved and does not occur in a known functional domain. Additionally, at least one functional study shows this variant is able to complement the growth defect of BRCA1 null cells, suggesting the variant does not impair BRCA1 function (Bouwman 2013). However, due to limited information, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. REFERENCES Ahmad J et al. Detection of BRCA1/2 mutations in breast cancer patients from Thailand and Pakistan. Clin Genet. 2012 Dec;82(6):594-8. Bouwman P et al. A high-throughput functional complementation assay for classification of BRCA1 missense variants. Cancer Discov. 2013 Oct;3(10):1142-55. Mannan AU et al. Detection of high frequency of mutations in a breast and/or ovarian cancer cohort: implications of embracing a multi-gene panel in molecular diagnosis in India. J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;61(6):515-22. Mehta A et al. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance associated with breast/ovarian cancer: a report from North India. Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Nov 30;10:6505-6516. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 29, 2022See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Lys1110del variant was identified in at least 1 of 55630 proband chromosomes from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Judkins 2005). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358335) “With Uncertain significance allele”, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 54 of 121128 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004), or 54 individuals from a population of South Asian individuals, and none from European (Non-Finnish), East Asian, Other, African, Latino, or European (Finnish) individuals; and the ClinVar database (classified as a variant with uncertain significance by BIC, Ambry Genetics and Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, CHEO and classification not provided by Invitae), and GeneInsight COGR database(3X, classified as “unknown significance” by 2 clinical laboratories, and unclassified by another). This variant is an in-frame deletion resulting in the removal of a lysine (Lys) residue at codon 1110; however, the impact of this alteration on BRCA1 protein function is not known. A cDNA-based functional complementation assay using BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, classified the variant as neutral by restoring cell proliferation and showing cisplatin sensitivity at levels similar to wild-type BRCA1 protein (Bouwman 2013). However, the impact of this alteration on other aspects of BRCA1 protein function is not known. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityFeb 09, 2021- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:5Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Nov 11, 2008- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Feb 20, 2004- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Christian Medical College-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 22, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterMay 05, 2023We detected an in-frame deletion in the BRCA1 gene (c.3328_3330delAAG) which results in the deletion of the amino acid lysine at position 1110. This mutation is considered as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 30, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 11, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 01, 2015- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 28, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 07, 2023Variant summary: BRCA1 c.3328_3330delAAG (p.Lys1110del) results in an in-frame deletion that is predicted to remove one amino acids from the encoded protein. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 250772 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0032 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is above 3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.3328_3330delAAG has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, without strong evidence for causality, and was additionally found in an unaffected individual in the literature (Mannan_2016). Experimental evidence including an HDR assay evaluating impact on protein function showed no damaging effect of this variant (Bouwman_2013, Bouwman_2020). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22486713, 23867111, 32546644, 25036526, 16267036, 26911350, 29785135, 28263838, 19370767). Multiple submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as benign/likely benign (n=7) and VUS (n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 24, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358335; hg19: chr17-41244217; API