rs80358350
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):āc.1965G>Cā(p.Glu655Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000041 in 1,461,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Benignin Lovd.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_133433.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIPBL | NM_133433.4 | c.1965G>C | p.Glu655Asp | missense_variant | 10/47 | ENST00000282516.13 | NP_597677.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIPBL | ENST00000282516.13 | c.1965G>C | p.Glu655Asp | missense_variant | 10/47 | 1 | NM_133433.4 | ENSP00000282516 | P1 | |
NIPBL | ENST00000448238.2 | c.1965G>C | p.Glu655Asp | missense_variant | 10/46 | 1 | ENSP00000406266 | |||
NIPBL | ENST00000652901.1 | c.1965G>C | p.Glu655Asp | missense_variant | 10/46 | ENSP00000499536 | ||||
NIPBL | ENST00000504430.5 | n.1585G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/8 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 250614Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135482
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461642Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at