Menu
GeneBe

rs80358395

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10120A>G(p.Thr3374Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000547 in 1,461,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T3374I) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.269
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07696962).
BP6
Variant 13-32398633-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398633-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51046.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10120A>G p.Thr3374Ala missense_variant 27/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.10120A>G p.Thr3374Ala missense_variant 27/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251266
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135806
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000547
AC:
8
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000275
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000719
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000468
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 23, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 24, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 23, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 17, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 16, 2022- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 17, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/251266 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in a single hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family with individuals with bilateral breast cancer history (PMID: 12955716 (2003)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 17, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.060
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
Cadd
Benign
1.4
Dann
Benign
0.87
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.063
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.079
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.077
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.71
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.027
Sift
Benign
0.030
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T
Vest4
0.027
MutPred
0.13
Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0166);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0166);
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.051
ClinPred
0.087
T
GERP RS
-4.5
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358395; hg19: chr13-32972770; API