rs80358398
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10154G>A(p.Arg3385His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,614,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.10154G>A | p.Arg3385His | missense_variant | 27/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.10154G>A | p.Arg3385His | missense_variant | 27/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.9785G>A | p.Arg3262His | missense_variant | 27/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*2212G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 26/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*2212G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 26/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251170Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135768
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 48AN: 1461854Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 24, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 19, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID:22752604 (2012)) and prostate cancer (PMID:21952622 (2011)). A functional study showed inconclusive results regarding the variant's impact on protein function (PMID: 32444794 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/113534 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 26, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22752604, 20960228) - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Mar 29, 2012 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 23, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Nov 16, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 22, 2023 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.10154G>A (p.Arg3385His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251270 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.10154G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and other cancer phenotypes (examples- Kote-Jarai _2011, Laitman _2011, Juwle_2012, Lu_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (BRCA2 c.7558C>T, p.Arg2520X; UMD database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Ikegami_2020). Tumors with pathogenic variants within BRCA and defective HDR have been shown to be particularly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapies and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, the efficacy of which is mediated through synthetic lethality in cancer cells with BRCA loss-of function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on homology directed repair (HDR capacity) based on a high throughput cell based viability assay (MANO-B method) to evaluate drug sensitivity of the BRCA2 variants treated with PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib and carboplatin) at various concentrations. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21952622, 22752604, 20960228, 24504028, 26689913, 32444794). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as benign/likely benign (n=6) and VUS (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
BRCA2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 20, 2023 | The BRCA2 c.10154G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg3385His. This variant was reported in individuals with breast, ovarian, or prostate cancer (Laitman et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 20960228; Table S1, Kote-Jarai et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21952622; Juwle et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22752604; Table S1, Cunningham et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24504028). Functional studies using PARP inhibitors showed that this variant does not significantly alter protein functions (Figure 2, Ikegami et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32444794). This variant is reported in 0.0033% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32972804-G-A) and has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in ClinVar ranging from benign to uncertain (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/37722). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 11, 2015 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Arg3385His variant was identified in 2 of 2626 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0008) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer (Laitman 2011, Cunningham 2014). The variant was also identified in ClinVar (as benign by Ambry Genetics and SCRP, as likely benign by CHEO and GeneDx, as uncertain significance by Emory Genetics, Invitae and BIC), Genesight-COGR (as likely benign by CHEO), LOVD 3.0 (1x, function effect unknown, and unclassified), UMD (1x as VUS), BIC (3x, classification pending) databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, ARUP Laboratories and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 4 of 245946 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Arg3385 residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid histamine (His) is present in dog, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. In addition computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at