rs80358417

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.1244A>Gā€‹(p.His415Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H415D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0460
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.20460224).
BP6
Variant 13-32332722-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332722-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51090.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=8, Likely_benign=4}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1244A>G p.His415Arg missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1244A>G p.His415Arg missense_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000802
AC:
2
AN:
249452
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000148
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135102
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000884
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000198
AC:
29
AN:
1460972
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000220
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
726738
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000198
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000823
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000302
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Dec 23, 2003- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of BolognaSep 01, 2023BP1(Strong)+BP5(Moderate) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthAug 23, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetics and Molecular Pathology, SA PathologyDec 31, 2019Insufficient evidence -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 23, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.His415Arg variant was identified in 2 of 1506 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Alemar 2017, Wong 2015). The variant was also identified in large population study by Momozawa (2018) in 5 of 14102 female chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004), and 7 in 22482 female control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) and 4 in 24980 male control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358417) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Color; as uncertain significance by six submitters), LOVD 3.0 (6x), and UMD-LSDB (9x as likely neutral). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3979C>T(p.Gln1327X)), increasing the likelihood that the p.His415Arg variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with pancreatic cancer, co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.5278-?_5592+?del, p.Ile1760_His1862delins37), further increasing the likelihood this variant has little clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 5 of 275910 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6428 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 4 of 126226 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.His415 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 19, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 14, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 07, 2024The p.H415R variant (also known as c.1244A>G), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1244. The histidine at codon 415 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in a cohort of 418 Brazilian individuals who met NCCN genetic testing guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (Alemar B et al. PLoS One, 2017 Nov;12:e0187630). This alteration has also been identified in individuals diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Wong-Brown MW et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015 Feb;150:71-80; Zuntini R et al. Front Genet, 2018 Sep;9:378; Santonocito C et al. Cancers (Basel), 2020 May;12:). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 03, 2022Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1244A>G (p.His415Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 249452 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1244A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS in individuals undergoing testing for Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer (example, Alemar_2017, Momozawa_2018, Wong-Brown_2015, Zuntini_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the UMD database (BRCA1 c.3979C>T, p.Gln1327Ter), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (VUS, n=6; likely benign, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 04, 2022- -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 19, 2021Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as 1472A>G; Observed in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, as well as, unaffected controls (Wong-Brown 2015, Alemar 2017, Momozawa 2018, Zuntini 2018, Mizukami 2020, Santonocito 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 25682074, 29161300, 30254663, 32438681, 30287823, 32980694) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 06, 2020- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchJan 29, 2014- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -
EBV-positive nodal T- and NK-cell lymphoma Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchDepartment of Clinical Pathology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.055
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
CADD
Benign
0.094
DANN
Benign
0.59
Eigen
Benign
-0.77
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.057
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.041
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.20
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.5
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.050
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T;T
Vest4
0.34
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.074
T
GERP RS
-1.4
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358417; hg19: chr13-32906859; API