rs80358417
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.1244A>Gā(p.His415Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. H415H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1244A>G | p.His415Arg | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.875A>G | p.His292Arg | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.1244A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 9 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000802 AC: 2AN: 249452Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135102
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 29AN: 1460972Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 726738
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:2
The BRCA2 p.His415Arg variant was identified in 2 of 1506 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Alemar 2017, Wong 2015). The variant was also identified in large population study by Momozawa (2018) in 5 of 14102 female chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004), and 7 in 22482 female control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) and 4 in 24980 male control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358417) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Color; as uncertain significance by six submitters), LOVD 3.0 (6x), and UMD-LSDB (9x as likely neutral). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3979C>T(p.Gln1327X)), increasing the likelihood that the p.His415Arg variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with pancreatic cancer, co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.5278-?_5592+?del, p.Ile1760_His1862delins37), further increasing the likelihood this variant has little clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 5 of 275910 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 1 of 6428 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 4 of 126226 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003); it was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.His415 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
BP1(Strong)+BP5(Moderate) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Insufficient evidence -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
- -
- -
The p.H415R variant (also known as c.1244A>G), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1244. The histidine at codon 415 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in a cohort of 418 Brazilian individuals who met NCCN genetic testing guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (Alemar B et al. PLoS One, 2017 Nov;12:e0187630). This alteration has also been identified in individuals diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Wong-Brown MW et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015 Feb;150:71-80; Zuntini R et al. Front Genet, 2018 Sep;9:378; Santonocito C et al. Cancers (Basel), 2020 May;12:). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
- -
Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1244A>G (p.His415Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 249452 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1244A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS in individuals undergoing testing for Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer (example, Alemar_2017, Momozawa_2018, Wong-Brown_2015, Zuntini_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the UMD database (BRCA1 c.3979C>T, p.Gln1327Ter), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (VUS, n=6; likely benign, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Observed in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, as well as, unaffected controls (PMID: 25682074, 29161300, 30287823, 30254663, 32980694, 32438681, 33471991); Published functional studies demonstrate homologous recombination activity similar to wild-type (PMID: 37731132); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as 1472A>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 25682074, 29161300, 30254663, 32438681, 30287823, 32980694, 29884841, 31131967, 32377563, 33471991, 31853058, 34597585, 34271781, 36775216, 35534704, 37937776, 36243179, 37731132) -
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
EBV-positive nodal T- and NK-cell lymphoma Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at