Menu
GeneBe

rs80358467

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM5BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1810A>G(p.Lys604Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000255 in 1,605,404 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K604?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.789
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-32333289-AA-G is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 266662.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10075468).
BP6
Variant 13-32333288-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333288-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37760.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32333288-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810A>G p.Lys604Glu missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810A>G p.Lys604Glu missense_variant 10/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152232
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000291
AC:
7
AN:
240642
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000230
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
130474
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000419
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000273
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000268
AC:
39
AN:
1453172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0000249
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
722610
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000543
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000477
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000167
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152232
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000130
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Nov 18, 2009- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 18, 2019IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000415 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 26, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJun 08, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of BolognaSep 01, 2023BP1(Strong)+BP5(Strong) according to ACMG/AMP classification guidelines specified for BRCA1 & BRCA2 (Classification Criteria V1.0.0 2023-09-08 - https://cspec.genome.network/cspec/ui/svi/affiliation/50087) (PMID: 38160042) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jun 17, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 16, 2016- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 21, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 30, 2021Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1810A>G (p.Lys604Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. A recent report from the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) challenge has classified this variant as benign (CAGI class 1) in a prediction protocol that includes assessment of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function using four sets of predictors (Padilla_2019, Cline_2019). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.9e-05 in 240642 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1810A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast And Ovarian Cancer (example, Ritterhouse_2016, Zuntini_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the UMD database and observed at our laboratory (UMD - BRCA1 c.5263_5264insC, p.Ser1755?fs; Our laboratory - BRCA1 c.68_69delAG, p.Glu23ValfsX17), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. The variant is classified predominantly as benign (Expert Panel)/likely benign (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Lys604Glu variant has not been previously reported in the literature, though it has been recorded in the BIC (x9) database. It is listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#:rs80358467), but no frequency information was provided, and so the prevalence of this variant in the population is not known. This residue is conserved in mammals, and computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 15, 2019- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.037
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.20
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.27
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.049
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.77
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T
Vest4
0.33
MutPred
0.19
Loss of methylation at K604 (P = 0.0067);Loss of methylation at K604 (P = 0.0067);
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.21
T
GERP RS
1.6
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358467; hg19: chr13-32907425; COSMIC: COSV104430655; API