Menu
GeneBe

rs80358626

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.3835A>G(p.Asn1279Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000141 in 1,565,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1279K) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.79
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13243416).
BP6
Variant 13-32338190-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338190-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51534.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=9}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3835A>G p.Asn1279Asp missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3835A>G p.Asn1279Asp missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000139
AC:
3
AN:
215842
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000852
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
117428
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000134
AC:
19
AN:
1412904
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000129
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
700348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000156
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000343
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Oct 21, 2009- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Jul 10, 1998- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 08, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthAug 15, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 23, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 07, 2023The p.N1279D variant (also known as c.3835A>G), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 3835. The asparagine at codon 1279 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in a cohort of 1663 Brazilian breast cancer patients who underwent hereditary multigene panel testing (Guindalini RSC et al. Sci Rep, 2022 Mar;12:4190). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 16, 2017This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.3835A>G at the cDNA level, p.Asn1279Asp (N1279D) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Asparagine to an Aspartic Acid (AAT>GAT). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 4063A>G. This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. BRCA2 Asn1279Asp was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, Lek 2016). Since Asparagine and Aspartic Acid differ in some properties, this is considered a semi-conservative amino acid substitution. BRCA2 Asn1279Asp occurs at a position that is not conserved and is located within the RAD51 binding domain (Roy 2012). In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Asn1279Asp is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 13, 2023In the published literature, this variant has been reported in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 35264596 (2022)). This variant is also reported to be located in a region of the BRCA2 gene that tolerant to missense sequence changes (PMID: 31911673 (2020)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/116358 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 01, 2021Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3835A>G (p.Asn1279Asp) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.4e-05 in 215842 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3835A>G in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported in the literature. The variant has been reported in one individual in the Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) database and in one individual diagnosed with brain cancer (Jones_2015). Nine ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) have cited the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Asn1279Asp was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358626) “With Uncertain significance allele”, and in the ClinVar database where it was classified with “uncertain” clinical significance by three submitters (Sharing Clinical Reports Project, derived from Myriad reports; BIC; Ambry Genetics). The variant was identified the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database in 2 of 52506 European (Non-Finnish) individuals; this low number of observations is not is not substantive enough to determine the frequency of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The variant was not identified in the literature, nor was it identified in any of the other databases searched. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Asn1279 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.23
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Benign
-0.81
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.82
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.15
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.0044
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.13
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.8
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Uncertain
0.027
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.096
T;T
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.65
MPC
0.022
ClinPred
0.063
T
GERP RS
3.4
gMVP
0.081

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358626; hg19: chr13-32912327; API