rs80358636

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.3916G>A​(p.Val1306Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000166 in 1,565,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1306A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.01

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15458512).
BP6
Variant 13-32338271-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338271-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 37866.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.3916G>A p.Val1306Ile missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.3916G>A p.Val1306Ile missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.3547G>A p.Val1183Ile missense_variant Exon 11 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.3916G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000191
AC:
4
AN:
209536
AF XY:
0.0000175
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000410
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000163
AC:
23
AN:
1413356
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000186
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
699850
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31246
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35108
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
38940
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
77812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51922
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5450
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000211
AC:
23
AN:
1090082
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
58328
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
5
7
9
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5198
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000374
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000353
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00000826
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Oct 12, 2009
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 04, 2023
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000685 -

not specified Benign:4
Sep 11, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.3916G>A (p.Val1306Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.9e-05 in 209536 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3916G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals undergoing testing for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer but has been classified as unequivocally neutral based on multifactorial probability models that employed several key parameters, namely co-occurrence in trans of a VUS with known deleterious mutations; detailed analysis, by logistic regression, of personal and family history of cancer in VUS-carrying probands; and, in a subset of probands, an analysis of cosegregation with disease in pedigrees (example, Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. No experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function were ascertained within the context of this evaluation, although this variant has been included among the neutrality controls in validation panels reviewing functional assays for analysis of VUS in BRCA2 (example Guidugli_2012). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments but a predominant consensus as benign (to include the expert panel)/likely benign (n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Oct 08, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2019
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Aug 26, 2021
St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.3916G>A (p.Val1306Ile) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0041% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32912408-G-A). Six of seven in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in two women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (BS2_supporting; https://whi.color.com/variant/13-32907401-G-C). It has also been reported in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 20104584). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BS2_supporting, BP4. -

Apr 12, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Dec 07, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2020
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 21990134, 22476429, 24323938, 20104584) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Mar 16, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 11, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.24
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.92
Eigen
Benign
-0.60
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.60
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.83
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.15
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
PhyloP100
2.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.91
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Uncertain
0.019
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.38
T;T
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.73
MPC
0.029
ClinPred
0.054
T
GERP RS
2.0
gMVP
0.058
Mutation Taster
=70/30
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358636; hg19: chr13-32912408; API