rs80358694

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.4599A>C​(p.Lys1533Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.904
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.051038653).
BP6
Variant 13-32338954-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338954-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51682.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=4}. Variant chr13-32338954-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4599A>C p.Lys1533Asn missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4599A>C p.Lys1533Asn missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.4230A>C p.Lys1410Asn missense_variant 11/271 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.4599A>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 10/262 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000918
AC:
23
AN:
250444
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000590
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135640
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000198
AC:
29
AN:
1461592
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
727094
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000731
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74336
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000529
ExAC
AF:
0.0000741
AC:
9

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Jun 20, 2002- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Apr 20, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 06, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 03, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 04, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 21, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 17, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 27, 2021Variant summary: BRCA2 c.4599A>C (p.Lys1533Asn) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.2e-05 in 250444 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0013 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.00075), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.4599A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA2 c.1547_1547delT, p.Phe516Serfs, BIC database; BRCA2 1775delT, Choi_2006; BRCA2 c.9382C>T, p.Arg3128X, internal database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Benign/likely benign n=5, VUS n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 08, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 26, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 08, 2020- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchA.C.Camargo Cancer Center / LGBM, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center-- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Lys1533Asn variant was identified in 4 of 2316 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was present in 1 of 638 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from healthy individuals (Haffty 2009, Ho Choi 2004, Silva 2014, Suter 2004). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358694) as “With other allele”, in ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Invitae, COGR, SCRP; as uncertain significance by Counsyl, BIC and two clinical laboratories), Clinvitae, GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, and BIC Database (unknown clinical importance). The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0, UMD-LSDB, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University database. The variant was identified in control databases in 24 of 276676 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was specifically observed in the East Asian population in 24 of 18864 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Lys1533 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 14, 2021- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.20
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.70
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.29
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.052
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.051
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T;T
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.43
Loss of methylation at K1533 (P = 0.0149);Loss of methylation at K1533 (P = 0.0149);
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
0.32
gMVP
0.19

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358694; hg19: chr13-32913091; COSMIC: COSV66458267; API