rs80358730

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.506A>G​(p.Lys169Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000173 in 1,613,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K169E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
2
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.48

Publications

17 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group D1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • medulloblastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 4 benign, 40 uncertain in NM_000059.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1809983).
BP6
Variant 13-32326272-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32326272-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 37941.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkc.506A>G p.Lys169Arg missense_variant Exon 6 of 27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3 P51587

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkc.506A>G p.Lys169Arg missense_variant Exon 6 of 27 5 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497.3 P51587
BRCA2ENST00000530893.7 linkc.137A>G p.Lys46Arg missense_variant Exon 6 of 27 1 ENSP00000499438.2 A0A590UJI7
BRCA2ENST00000614259.2 linkn.506A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 26 2 ENSP00000506251.1 A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000557
AC:
14
AN:
251168
AF XY:
0.0000515
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000183
AC:
268
AN:
1460892
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000179
AC XY:
130
AN XY:
726808
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39624
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53390
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5720
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000223
AC:
248
AN:
1111266
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000331
AC:
20
AN:
60358
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
26
39
52
65
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000483
AC:
2
AN:
41448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5202
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4836
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
9
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000184
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567
ExAC
AF:
0.0000412
AC:
5
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:3Benign:3
Apr 03, 2007
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Nov 17, 2015
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2016
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Oct 03, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 23, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.506A>G (p.Lys169Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.6e-05 in 251168 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00011 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (5.6e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.506A>G has been reported in the literature in as a VUS in settings of somatic and germline multigene panel testing in individuals with a wide variety of cancers, example, male prostate cancer, breast cancer, the cancer genome atlas (TGCA) cohort, ALL, low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) (example, Kote-Jarai_2011, Davies_2018, Lu_2015, Zhang_2015, Zhang_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least two co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported in the BIC database (BRCA2 c.8537_8538delAG, p.Glu2846Glyfs; BRCA1 c.188T>A, p.Leu63X) and with a driver KRAS mutation, p.G12V in an individual with low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) (Zhang_2021), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Biswas_2020). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant in a mouse embryonic stem cell-based functional assay examining the ability to rescue the lethality of Brca2 null mESC as well as sensitivity to six DNA damaging agents including ionizing radiation and a PARP inhibitor. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation with conflicting assessments and a predominant consensus towards a benign/likely benign (n=6) outcome (VUS, n=3). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 16, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 06, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 03, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 02, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Apr 28, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

BRCA2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Jan 19, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.506A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Lys169Arg. This variant has been documented in the literature as a variant of uncertain significance in individuals undergoing a wide variety of cancer testing, but no additional data supports its pathogenicity (Kote-Jarai et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21952622; Hondow et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21702907). In silico splicing algorithms predict this variant will create a cryptic splice junction; however functional analysis of splicing indicated it does not alter splicing (Alamut Visual Plus v.1.6.1; Table S3b, Houdayer et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22505045; Table S1, Wai et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32123317). This variant is reported in 0.012% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from benign to a variant of uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/37941/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jan 06, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.29
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.017
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.18
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
PhyloP100
2.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.61
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.048
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Vest4
0.35
MutPred
0.26
Loss of methylation at K169 (P = 0.0062);Loss of methylation at K169 (P = 0.0062);
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.024
ClinPred
0.063
T
GERP RS
2.7
gMVP
0.43
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.12
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358730; hg19: chr13-32900409; COSMIC: COSV99061754; API