Menu
GeneBe

rs80358755

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5312G>A(p.Gly1771Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000331 in 1,612,280 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G1771A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:31O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.530
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.029400349).
BP6
Variant 13-32339667-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32339667-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37958.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32339667-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32339667-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00034 (497/1460130) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00886 (51/5756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00692. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 241 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 45. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5312G>A p.Gly1771Asp missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.5312G>A p.Gly1771Asp missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152032
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000725
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000335
AC:
84
AN:
250488
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000339
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135596
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000995
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000424
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000983
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000340
AC:
497
AN:
1460130
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.000332
AC XY:
241
AN XY:
726452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000842
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000295
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000713
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.000453
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000272
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000582
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000305
AC:
37
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000889

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:31Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:9Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsDec 08, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtJul 28, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 16, 2006- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000153 -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 29, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's UniversityApr 20, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Gly1771Asp variant was identified in 6 of 1934 proband chromosomes from individuals with breast cancer, ovarian cancer or prostate cancer and was not detected in 100 control chromosomes evaluated (Edwards 2003, Hadjisavvas 2003, Hondow 2011, Kauff 2002, Thirthagiri 2008, Toh 2008). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs80358755) “With probable-non-pathogenic allele” with a minor allele frequency of 0.0005 (1000 Genomes Project), and in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (with a frequency of 0.0006 in European American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (43X with no clinical importance, 1X with unknown clinical importance), and in UMD (25X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was twice listed co-occur with a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA2 c.759 759delinsACA (p.Ser253ArgfsX24) and BRCA1 c.IVS5+3A>G (c.212+3A>G)), increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein (though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity), and two in silico studies using multifactorial likelihood-ratio models predict the variant to be neutral or of no clinical significance (Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). Furthermore, the p.Gly1771 residue is not conserved in mammals and lower organisms, and the variant amino acid aspartic acid (Asp) is present in rat and mouse, further increasing the likelihood that this variant is not clinically important. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 06, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Clinvar: 7 labs classify as LB/Ben; ExAC: 0.1% (6/11554) Latino chromosomes -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 18, 2018- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 09, 2015Variant Summary: The variant of interst causes a missense change in a non-conserved position with 3/5 in silico programs predicting a "benign" outcome. The variant of interest has an observed allele frequency of 41/121940 (1/2976) including 1 homozygous occurrence. Functional analysis through the use of allelic imbalance implicated the variant does not affect splicing (Caux-Moncoutier_2009). The variant of interest has been reported in multiple affected individuals, however, it has shown lack of co-segregation within one family with an affected individual not carrying the variant of interest (Carvallone_2010). In addition, the variant of interest was reported to co-occur with another potentially pathogenic BRCA2 variant, c.759_759delinsACA and a potentially pathogenic BRCA1 variant, c.212+3A>G. Furthermore, multiple reputable databases/laboratories (ARUP, UMD, SCRP, GeneDx and Ambry Genetics) and publications (Lindor_2012, Easton_2007, and Cunningham_2014) classify the variant as "likely benign/benign/polymorphism." Therefore, taken all together, the variant of interest is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Apr 11, 2023- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024BRCA2: BP4, BS3:Supporting, BS1 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 10, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 10, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Sep 28, 2020- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBiochemical Molecular Genetic Laboratory, King Abdulaziz Medical CityFeb 05, 2020- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 13, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
Cadd
Benign
2.6
Dann
Benign
0.72
Eigen
Benign
-0.99
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.039
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.066
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.029
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.43
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.54
T;T
Vest4
0.22
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.0040
T
GERP RS
-0.34
gMVP
0.13

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358755; hg19: chr13-32913804; COSMIC: COSV99061739; API