Menu
GeneBe

rs80358765

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5414A>G(p.Asn1805Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000632 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1805D) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:13B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.126
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.19550696).
BP6
Variant 13-32339769-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32339769-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51858.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=9}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5414A>G p.Asn1805Ser missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.5414A>G p.Asn1805Ser missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000557
AC:
14
AN:
251178
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000516
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135788
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000370
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000568
AC:
83
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.0000523
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
727126
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000926
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000513
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000896
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000982
ExAC
AF:
0.0000412
AC:
5
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:13Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:6
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylFeb 14, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsJun 04, 2021This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 03, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 27, 2023Observed in individuals with breast or ovarian cancer (Soegaard et al., 2008; Pal et al., 2015; Encinas et al., 2018; Chandrasekaran et al., 2021; Dorling et al., 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as 5642A>G; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29854292, 9971877, 18559594, 11929857, 27527004, 19139070, 10923033, 26287763, 31256854, 33868589, 33643918, 35464868, 34503154, 33471991) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityOct 20, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 14, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 14, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 28, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 18, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Feb 14, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 21, 2024- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Asn1805Ser variant was identified in 3 of 1982 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and was present in 1 of 190 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Pal 2015, Soegaard 2008, Wagner 1999, Encinas 2018). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358765) as "with uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx and six other submitters; and as likely benign by Invitae and Color), and the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB database. It was also identified in control databases in 18 of 276966 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 9 of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 1 of 6456 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 2 of 126516 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), and South Asian in 6 of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), while the variant was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian or Finnish populations. The p.Asn1805Ser residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and three out of four in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, Human Splicing Finder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 10, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5414A>G (p.Asn1805Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.8e-05 in 395988 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00035 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v2.1 and v3.2 dataset). This frequency is somewhat lower than the maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (0.00075), allowing no clear conclusions about variant significance. However, the variant was also reported from the southern part of Africa with even higher allele frequencies, e.g. 0.014 (3/208 alleles; in the GenomeAsia 100K database) and 0.027 (Oosthuizen_2021), supporting a benign role for the variant. c.5414A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast- and/or ovarian cancer (e.g. Soegaard_2008, Pal_2015, Encinas_2018), but was also found in controls (Wagner_1999). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Fourteen other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as Benign (n=2), likely benign (n=3) or VUS (n=9). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMGZ Medical Genetics CenterFeb 09, 2024ACMG codes applied following ENIGMA VCEP rules: BP1_STR -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
1.3
Dann
Benign
0.80
Eigen
Benign
-0.26
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.31
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.20
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.052
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.20
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.89
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.3
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T;T
Vest4
0.22
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.093
T
GERP RS
5.7
gMVP
0.097

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358765; hg19: chr13-32913906; API