rs80358874

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6338A>G(p.Asn2113Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000609 in 1,608,786 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.03

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018149316).

BP6

Variant 13-32340693-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340693-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 38039.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32340693-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.6338A>G	p.Asn2113Ser	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.6338A>G	p.Asn2113Ser	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.5969A>G	p.Asn1990Ser	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.6338A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

244836

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000166

AC XY:

AN XY:

132490

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000181

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00164

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000338

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000563

AC:

AN:

1456562

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000607

AC XY:

AN XY:

724400

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000117

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000183

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152224

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74370

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000205

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000831

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000659

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:15

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000000000117 -

Mar 08, 2006

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jan 30, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.6338A>G (p.Asn2113Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, which 3/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 8/119730 (1/14662), which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic BRCA2 variant of 1/1333. Multiple publications have cited the variant in affected individuals that have also classified the variant as "benign/neutral." In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign. In addition, BRCAshare, a reputable database that incorporates LCA samples indicates the variant co-occurred with another pathogenic BRCA2 variant, c.5576_5579delTTA in 3 individuals, along with an internal LCA sample reports the variant to co-occur with a BRCA1 pathogenic variant, c.68_29delAG. Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -

Sep 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BS2 -

Jun 27, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Apr 21, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 04, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Oct 30, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:2

Mar 30, 2023

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Asn2113Ser variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358874) as "With other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and two other submitters; as likely benign by four submitters; as uncertain significance by three submitters), MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (5x), UMD-LSDB (6x as likely neutral), BIC Database (13x), and in ARUP Laboratories (not pathogenic or of no clinical significance) databases. The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, or the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 30 of 271298 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 3 of 6322 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Latino in 6 of 33104 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 5 of 124988 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Ashkenazi Jewish in 16 of 9828 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), while the variant was not observed in the African, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Asn2113 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, a systematic genetic assessment and multifactorial probability based model identified the variant has odds in favor of neutrality 1749 and posterior probability of being deleterious 1.17âˆšÃ³10-11 (Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.088

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.42

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

0.035

DANN

Benign

0.59

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.063

M_CAP

Benign

0.045

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.90

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Benign

0.11

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.099

Sift

Uncertain

0.028

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

T;T

Vest4

0.19

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.019

ClinPred

0.037

GERP RS

0.28

gMVP

0.10

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over