Menu
GeneBe

rs80358877

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6413T>A(p.Val2138Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000563 in 1,598,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2138F) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.46
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.094163805).
BP6
Variant 13-32340768-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340768-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52088.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, not_provided=1, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6413T>A p.Val2138Asp missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6413T>A p.Val2138Asp missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152244
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000213
AC:
5
AN:
234562
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000315
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
127156
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000165
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000484
AC:
7
AN:
1445806
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.00000695
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
719042
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152244
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 25, 2023This missense variant replaces valine with aspartic acid at codon 2138 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has reported that this variant does not impact BRCA2 function, as assayed by response to PARP inhibitors (PMID: 32444794). This variant has been reported in an individual suspected to be affected with Lynch syndrome and an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25980754, DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P3-07-07). The individual affected with breast cancer also carried a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 gene that could explain the observed phenotype (DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P3-07-07). This variant has been identified in 5/234562 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 14, 2021The p.V2138D variant (also known as c.6413T>A), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 6413. The valine at codon 2138 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This variant was identified in a cohort of 681 ancestrally diverse, healthy subjects (Bodian DL et al. PLoS One, 2014 Apr;9:e94554). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
not specified Uncertain:2Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 31, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.6413T>A (p.Val2138Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.9e-05 in 242246 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.6413T>A has been reported in the literature as a VUS in a study reporting multigene panel findings among individuals who underwent clinical genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (example, Yurgelun_2015). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant in a high-throughput functional evaluation utilizing BRCA2-deficient cells and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (Ikegami_2020). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 30630528, 32444794, 25980754). Six submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=4) and likely benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchResearch Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of TorontoJan 31, 2014- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 18, 2023This missense variant replaces valine with aspartic acid at codon 2138 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has reported that this variant does not impact BRCA2 function, as assayed by response to PARP inhibitors (PMID: 32444794). This variant has been reported in an individual suspected to be affected with Lynch syndrome and an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 25980754, DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P3-07-07). The individual affected with breast cancer also carried a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 gene that could explain the observed phenotype (DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P3-07-07). This variant has been identified in 5/234562 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 01, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in at least one individual with a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or colon polyps (Yurgelun 2015); Also known as 6641T>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31131967, 24728327, 25980754) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 18, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00017 (5/30274 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals suspected of Lynch Syndrome (PMID: 25980754 (2015)) as well as in healthy controls (PMID: 24728327 (2014)). A published study using BRCA2-deficient cells and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors suggested that this variant has no damaging effect on protein function, but further studies are required to confirm the functional efficiency of this variant (PMID: 32444794 (2020)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 26, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.090
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
Cadd
Benign
1.8
Dann
Benign
0.65
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.021
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.022
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.094
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.87
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
0.034
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T
Vest4
0.21
MutPred
0.24
Loss of sheet (P = 0.0104);Loss of sheet (P = 0.0104);
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.030
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
-4.3
gMVP
0.15

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358877; hg19: chr13-32914905; API