Menu
GeneBe

rs80358978

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM1BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7522G>A(p.Gly2508Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G2508D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

7
6
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:11B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.81
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 6 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_000059.4
BP6
Variant 13-32356514-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32356514-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52347.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Likely_benign=4, Likely_pathogenic=1, Uncertain_significance=8, not_provided=1}. Variant chr13-32356514-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.7522G>A p.Gly2508Ser missense_variant 15/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.7522G>A p.Gly2508Ser missense_variant 15/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000159
AC:
40
AN:
251392
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000147
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
135868
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000315
AC:
46
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000344
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000453
ExAC
AF:
0.000107
AC:
13
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:11Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 07, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 08, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 20, 2022Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7522G>A (p.Gly2508Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the helical domain (IPR015252) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 310330 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0023 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC) phenotype (0.00075), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. The variant, c.7522G>A, has been reported in the literature in numerous individuals affected with tumors that belong to the HBOC spectrum, however it was also found in several healthy controls. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA2 c.8340_8343delTAAC (p.Asn2781ValfsX39) in the BIC database and BRCA1 c.3627dupA (p.Glu1210Argfs) in Lim_2009), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. A large case-control study involving breast cancer patients and controls of Asian ancestry (Han_2017), found an enrichment of this variant in cases (OR: 3.02 (95%CI: 1.69-5.39), p-value: 0.000123). However, an other case-control association study, involving breast cancer patients and controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa_2018), did not demonstrate significant increase in breast/ovarian cancer risk (i.e. the variant was identified in 5/7051 female cases, and 6/11241 female controls; OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.3-5.2)). A further study, involving Korean breast cancer patients, where multifactorial probability was estimated by performing systematic assessments of variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes (which included analysis of co-occurrence with known deleterious mutations, personal and family history of cancer and tumor pathology), predicted this variant to be likely pathogenic, although the variant was interpreted as likely benign when applying the ACMG/AMP guidelines (Lee_2018). Several publications reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated a mild impact on BRCA2 function, representing an activity comparable to wild-type, or a somewhat hypomorphic allele (e.g. Shimelis_2017, Mesman_2018, Guidugli_2018, Ikegami_2020). Eleven other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (VUS, n=6, likely benign, n=3 or benign, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 06, 2016- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 13, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 03, 2022The c.7522G>A (p.G2508S) alteration is located in exon 15 (coding exon 14) of the BRCA2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 7522, causing the glycine (G) at amino acid position 2508 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 05, 2021- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Oct 07, 2008- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncJul 21, 2017- -
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Infiltrating duct carcinoma of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncJul 21, 2017- -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLaboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityNov 01, 2015- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2, p.Gly2508Ser variant was identified in 6 of 1220 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with breast, ovarian and thyroid cancers. (Lim 2009, Yu 2015, Wong 2016). The variant was also identified 1x in a study of 681 health controls in an east Asian individual (Bodian 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358978) “With other allele.” This variant was identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (March 14, 2016) in 13 of 8636 chromosomes (frequency: 0 0.0015) in the East Asian population, and was not found in populations of South Asians, European (Non-Finnish), African, Latino, European (Finnish) and other individuals, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. In the Clinvar Database the variant was identified with conflicting interpretations: as likely benign by Invitae, GeneDX and Sharing Reports Project derived from Myriad reports, as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics and BIC,classification was not provided by ITMI. In BIC the variant was identified 4x with unknown clinical significance. In the Fanconi Anaemia Mutation Database (LOVD) the variant was identified 2x (1x as neutral by Karchin 2008 and 1x as deleterious by Pettigrew 2008). This variant was not identified in NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), COSMIC, GeneInsight COGR, or ARUP Laboratories Databases. The p.Gly2508 residue is conserved across mammals and lower organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the Ser (Serine) variant may impact the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. Karchin et al 2008 has concluded the variant as predicted neutral using protein likelihood ratios to determine all variants of undetermined significance in the C-terminal binding domain of the BRCA2 protein. However, the variant was predicted to result in an increased exonic splice enhancer (ESE) motif score at an evolutionarily conserved ESE (Pettigrew 2008) and therefore the variant was concluded to be deleterious. In a multigene panel study of breast cancer predisposition in Asians, the authors categorized the p.Gly2508Ser variant as pathogenic using Manchester and Boadicea scores. Family history was evaluated in this multigene study (Wong 2016). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyCenter for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital-- -
Cancer of the pancreas Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncJul 21, 2017- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 16, 2023- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.56
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.091
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.35
Cadd
Pathogenic
28
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.92
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.55
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.75
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.78
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Vest4
0.86
MutPred
0.81
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0388);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0388);
MVP
0.97
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.35
T
GERP RS
5.5
gMVP
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.11
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358978; hg19: chr13-32930651; COSMIC: COSV99061708; API