rs80359090

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8432A>G(p.Asp2811Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000991 in 1,613,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.07

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 13-32370502-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32370502-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52585.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=5}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.8432A>G	p.Asp2811Gly	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.8432A>G	p.Asp2811Gly	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.8063A>G	p.Asp2688Gly	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*490A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 18 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259 link	n.*490A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 18 of 25	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000796

AC:

AN:

251384

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135874

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000103

AC:

AN:

1461690

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

727166

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74340

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000688

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:2

Jun 17, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8432A>G (p.Asp2811Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251384 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.8432A>G has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with early onset breast cancer (Malone_2000). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Several publications have used a variety of in silico modelling tools to predict the impact of the variant on protein function and have classified it as having a neutral or likely benign effect (e.g. Karchin_2008, Padilla_2019, Cline_2019). For example, a recent report from the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) Challenge has classified this variant as likely benign in a prediction protocol that includes assessment of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function using four sets of predictors (Padilla_2019). This classification was also supported by consensus from six prediction teams in a second publication, also as part of the CAGI5 ENIGMA Challenge (Cline_2019). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Two laboratories classified the variant as likely benign and three as VUS. . Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Jun 16, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in 1 paper; ClinVar: 1 VUS -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jul 03, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.8432A>G (p.Asp2811Gly) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with breast cancer (PMIDs: 10717622 (2000)). Multifactorial studies have suggested that this variant is likely to be neutral (PMIDs: 19043619 (2008), 31131967 (2019, and 31294896 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000008 (2/251384 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Aug 19, 2024

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:1

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Apr 21, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 16, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.D2811G variant (also known as c.8432A>G), located in coding exon 18 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 8432. The aspartic acid at codon 2811 is replaced by glycine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was reported in a woman with breast cancer from a population based case-control study (Malone KE et al. Cancer 2000 Mar; 88(6):1393-402). Of note, this alteration is also known as 8660A>G in published literature. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

BRCA2-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Aug 09, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.8432A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asp2811Gly. This variant was reported in an individual with breast cancer (Malone et al. 2000. PubMed ID: 10717622). This variant is reported in 0.0054% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD, and has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in ClinVar ranging from likely benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/52585/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 19, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.15

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.19

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

Eigen

Uncertain

0.52

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.52

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.22

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.72

D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.27

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.8

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.57

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.011

D;D

Vest4

0.81

MutPred

0.75

Loss of stability (P = 0.0149);Loss of stability (P = 0.0149);

MVP

0.91

MPC

0.18

ClinPred

0.89

GERP RS

5.2

gMVP

0.57

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over