rs80359097

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.847A>G(p.Ile283Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000249 in 1,603,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.085516095).

BP6

Variant 13-32332325-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32332325-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52598.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=8}. Variant chr13-32332325-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.847A>G	p.Ile283Val	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.847A>G	p.Ile283Val	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.478A>G	p.Ile160Val	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.847A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000413

AC:

AN:

242314

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

130948

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000900

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000207

AC:

AN:

1451742

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

721830

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000167

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74382

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:3Benign:2

Nov 03, 2014

Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 31, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:2

May 25, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jul 20, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 23, 2023

University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -

May 09, 2023

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 283 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 23635950, 30400234). This variant has been identified in 1/242314 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jun 19, 2015

Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 26, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

May 04, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.847A>G (p.Ile283Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.1e-06 in 242314 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.847A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (examples: Dobricic_2013, Diaz-Zabala_2018) and affected with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Ko_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 23635950, 30400234, 31396961). Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments, classifying the variant as uncertain significance (n=5) or likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Fanconi anemia complementation group D1

Uncertain:1

Jul 13, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jun 03, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 17899372, 30400234, 23635950) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.069

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

0.17

DANN

Benign

0.27

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0047

M_CAP

Benign

0.058

MetaRNN

Benign

0.086

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.91

PrimateAI

Benign

0.23

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.20

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.17

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.48

T;T

Vest4

0.17

MutPred

0.25

Gain of disorder (P = 0.0668);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0668);

MVP

0.64

MPC

0.019

ClinPred

0.045

GERP RS

-3.4

gMVP

0.052

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over