rs80359105
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 1P and 8B. PP3BP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8525G>A(p.Arg2842His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000514 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
11
2
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.52
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.745
BP6
Variant 13-32370993-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32370993-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52611.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32370993-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32370993-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.8525G>A | p.Arg2842His | missense_variant | 20/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8525G>A | p.Arg2842His | missense_variant | 20/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152062Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
152062
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000597 AC: 15AN: 251110Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000663 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135702
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
251110
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
135702
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000506 AC: 74AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000509 AC XY: 37AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
74
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
727202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74404
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74404
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
7
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000259 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Oct 07, 2010 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 04, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 16, 2024 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8525G>A (p.Arg2842His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Tower domain (IPR015205) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6e-05 in 251110 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00049 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. In addition, this variant was also reported in 3/7325 European American women, who were older than age 70, and have never had cancer (in the FLOSSIES database). The variant, c.8525G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals breast cancer, however without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Martin_2001, Weber-Mangal_2003, Lee_2008, Ng_2016, Chan_2018) as well as in at least one individual with a positive family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer (Carney_2010). In a recent large study evaluating breast cancer cases and controls in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), the variant was reported in 10/60466 cases, but was also found in 11/53461 controls (Dorling_2021, reported through LOVD). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA1 c.2685_2686del, p.Pro897fs (LOVD database); BRCA1 c.2635G>T, p.E879X (Chan_2018)), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple publications reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and in general demonstrated similar activity to the wild-type, including homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) assays (e.g. Guidugli_2018, Ikegami_2020, Brnich_2021, Richardson_2021, Biswas_2023). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33964450, 21218378, 30093976, 29394989, 32444794, 19043619, 18284688, 11304778, 26757417, 14520696, 33609447, 33471991, 37922907). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 52611). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 21990134, 24323938, 21218378, 19043619, 20167696, 28624499, 11304778, 26757417, 18284688, 14520696, 25348012, 16683254, 28324225, 18951446, 29394989, 30093976, 32444794, 29884841) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 06, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 13, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 12, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 12, 2021 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Arg2842His variant was identified in 5 of 3552 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Chao 2016, Lee 2008, Martin 2001, Ng 2016). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359105 as With Uncertain significance, other allele), ClinVar (13x as benign or likely benign, reviewed by an expert panel), LOVD 3.0 (17x between benign and inconclusive), UMD-LSDB (1 x as likely neutral), and ARUP Laboratories (as not pathogenic). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, BIC Database, or Zhejiang University Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 16 of 276812 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 1 of 24028 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), Latino in 1 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European Non-Finnish in 6 of 126350 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), and East Asian in 8 of 18852 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004); it was not observed in the “Other”, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, and South Asian populations. One study showed homology-directed DNA repair activity by the p.Arg2842His variant (Guidugli 2018) and mathematical models predict that this variant is benign (Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). The p.Arg2842 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not reliably predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time, although the information currently available suggests a benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at