Menu
GeneBe

rs80359127

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8668C>A(p.Leu2890Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000397 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L2890V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000042 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.362
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23898467).
BP6
Variant 13-32376705-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32376705-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52655.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=11, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr13-32376705-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8668C>A p.Leu2890Ile missense_variant 21/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.8668C>A p.Leu2890Ile missense_variant 21/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251326
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135854
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000424
AC:
62
AN:
1461854
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000481
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000549
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152150
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000564
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000151
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:4Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 07, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 29, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthSep 17, 2023This missense variant replaces leucine with isoleucine at codon 2890 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 36329109), an individual affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28591715), and an individual affected with prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium this variant was reported in 3/60466 cases and 2/53461 controls (OR=1.326, 95%CI 0.222 to 7.938; p-value=1) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000363). This variant has also been identified in 5/282728 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 30, 2022Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Also known as 8896C>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19043619, 24817641, 31911673, 29884841, 28591715, 12228710, 36329109, 32377563, 21952622, 31853058, 28726806) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 18, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 21, 2014- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 16, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalApr 29, 2021The BRCA2 c.8668C>A (p.Leu2890Ile) missense change has a maximum frequency of 0.0080% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32950842-C-A?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). In silico tools are not in agreement about the effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional assays have not been performed. This variant is absent in the FLOSSIES database which contains genetic variants from women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (https://whi.color.com/). This variant was reported in an individual with prostate cancer who was either diagnosed <65 years of age or diagnosed >65 years of age with a family history of prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: no applicable criteria. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 28, 2023This missense variant replaces leucine with isoleucine at codon 2890 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 36329109), an individual affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28591715), and an individual affected with prostate cancer (PMID: 21952622). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium this variant was reported in 3/60466 cases and 2/53461 controls (OR=1.326, 95%CI 0.222 to 7.938; p-value=1) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_000363). This variant has also been identified in 5/282728 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 10, 2023The p.L2890I variant (also known as c.8668C>A), located in coding exon 20 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 8668. The leucine at codon 2890 is replaced by isoleucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in 1/257 Brazilian patients with suspected hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) (Matta BP et al. Sci Rep, 2022 Nov;12:18629). This alteration was also detected in a prostate cancer patient who was either diagnosed <65y or diagnosed >65y with a family history of prostate cancer (Kote-Jarai Z et al. Br J Cancer. 2011 Oct 11;105:1230-4). This alteration is predicted to be neutral or stabilizing by other models and in silico tools (Karchin R et al. Cancer Inform. 2008 Apr;6:203-16; Doss CG et al. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014 Nov;70:939-56). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMGZ Medical Genetics CenterFeb 09, 2024ACMG codes applied following ENIGMA VCEP rules: BP4 -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 15, 2022Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8668C>A (p.Leu2890Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251326 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.8668C>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer (example, Karchin_2008) and other cancer phenotypes (example, Kote-Jarai_2011, Deihimi_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant(s) have been observed at our laboratory (BRCA1 c.3340G>T, p.Glu1114*), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments (Likely benign, n=2; VUS, n=9). Some cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Uncertain
0.20
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.091
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.068
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.24
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.80
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.45
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.047
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.090
T;T
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.082
ClinPred
0.33
T
GERP RS
3.6
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359127; hg19: chr13-32950842; API