rs80359171

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM5PP3_Moderate

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9155G>A(p.Arg3052Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000223 in 1,613,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R3052W) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:4B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.32

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.

PM5

Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-32380043-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.864

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.9155G>A	p.Arg3052Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.9155G>A	p.Arg3052Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.8786G>A	p.Arg2929Gln	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1213G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 23 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259 link	n.*1213G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 23 of 25	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000132

AC:

AN:

152030

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251200

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135792

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000233

AC:

AN:

1461774

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000193

AC XY:

AN XY:

727188

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000279

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000132

AC:

AN:

152030

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74262

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000617

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:4Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Dec 23, 2003

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 09, 2011

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 18, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Apr 02, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 15, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Sep 26, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Sep 15, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22678057, 12228710, 19043619, 19563646, 19200354, 21990134, 24323938, 25146914, 18607349, 17924331, 27616075, 28487467, 27067391, 28283652, 29988080, 30287823, 31200359, 32486089, 31131967) -

Aug 03, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of urinary bladder

Pathogenic:1

Laboratory of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Significance: Pathogenic

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

Apr 24, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Mar 15, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.9155G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg3052Gln. This variant was previously reported in individuals with cancer or a family history of cancer (see, for example, Bhai et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34326862; Kraus et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27616075); however, it did not segregate with autosomal dominant disease in all studies and was also described in the heterozygous state in control cohorts (Gómez García et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19200354; Okawa et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36243179). This variant is reported in 0.0035% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In the ClinVar database, this variant is listed as ‘uncertain’ or ‘likely benign’ by outside laboratories (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/38217/). At this time, although we suspect that this variant is benign in the context of autosomal dominant disease, the clinical significance of this variant in regards to autosomal recessive disease is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 15, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.48

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.33

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.83

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.62

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.86

D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.75

PrimateAI

Benign

0.41

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

N;N

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.70

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Vest4

0.76

MVP

0.96

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.92

GERP RS

5.5

gMVP

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over