Menu
GeneBe

rs80359177

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9190G>A(p.Asp3064Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000428 in 1,613,906 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D3064G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000046 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.30
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.37024686).
BP6
Variant 13-32380079-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32380079-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52772.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1, Likely_benign=5}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9190G>A p.Asp3064Asn missense_variant 24/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.9190G>A p.Asp3064Asn missense_variant 24/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152124
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251296
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135830
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000458
AC:
67
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000385
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
727196
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000567
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152124
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74300
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000434
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 07, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 04, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25348012, 19043619, 25925381, 24817641, 29641532) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 16, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 05, 2020The BRCA2 c.9190G>A; p.Asp3064Asn variant (rs80359177), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 52772). This variant is found on only five chromosomes (5/282678 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The aspartate at codon 3064 is weakly conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.311). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Asp3064Asn variant is uncertain at this time. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 21, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 20, 2012- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 19, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsAug 07, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 26, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 12, 2020Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9190G>A (p.Asp3064Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2, OB3 domain (IPR015188) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251296 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.9190G>A has been reported in the literature in patients undergoing testing without information on cancer phenotype and in the UK10K cohort of control individuals collected as part of non-cancer studies (example, Qian_2018, Pritchard_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Furthermore, a computational method that produces a probabilistic likelihood ratio has reported this variant as having a neutral outcome (Karchin_2008). At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported at our laboratory (BRCA2 c.6408_6414delAAATGTT, p.N2137fs*29), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation reporting a majority consensus towards a benign/likely benign outcome (n=5). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was re-classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 05, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.036
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.030
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.37
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.68
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.82
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.25
T;T
Vest4
0.43
MutPred
0.37
Loss of ubiquitination at K3059 (P = 0.1296);Loss of ubiquitination at K3059 (P = 0.1296);
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.60
D
GERP RS
3.7
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359177; hg19: chr13-32954216; API