rs80359228

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9586A>G(p.Lys3196Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000446 in 1,614,096 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.83

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09100455).

BP6

Variant 13-32396982-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32396982-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 38251.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr13-32396982-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.9586A>G	p.Lys3196Glu	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.9586A>G	p.Lys3196Glu	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.9217A>G	p.Lys3073Glu	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1644A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 25 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*1644A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 25 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000994

AC:

AN:

251428

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135886

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000452

AC:

AN:

1461778

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000495

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000497

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74470

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.0000750

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000988

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Mar 09, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2020

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 05, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25637381, 26332594, 24607278, 11139248, 25556971, 21120943, 27153395, 25985138, 27062684, 23704879, 27067391, 30254663, 31131559, 32123317) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 13, 2025

Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1, BP1_Strong c.9586A>G, located in exon 26 of the BRCA2 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Lys by Glu at codon 3196, p.(Lys3196Glu). This position is outside a (potentially) clinically important functional domain and, moreover, the SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP1_strong). It was found in 10/34260 alleles, with a filter allele frequency of 0.015% at 95% confidence, within the Latino population in the gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) (BS1). To our knowledge, no well-stablished functional studies have been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in the ClinVar database (6x benign, 8x likely benign,4x uncertain significance), in the LOVD database (1x likely benign, 10x uncertain significance) and in the BRCA Exchange database as Not yet reviewed. Based on currently available information, the variant c.9586A>G should be considered a benign variant. -

Jul 23, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 23, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 11, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in 1 male breast cancer patient - multiple other publications report as nonpathogenic; ClinVar: 5 B/LB, 1 VUS -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 20, 2024

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The missense variant NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9586A>G (p.Lys3196Glu) has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. The variant is observed in one or more well-documented healthy adults. There is a small physicochemical difference between lysine and glutamic acid, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. The gene BRCA2 has a low rate of benign missense variation as indicated by a high missense variants Z-Score of 1.00. The gene BRCA2 contains 148 pathogenic missense variants, indicating that missense variants are a common mechanism of disease in this gene. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Uncertain Significance. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:2

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Lys3196Glu variant was identified in 1 of 74 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.014) from individuals or families with male breast cancer, and was not identified in 200 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Kwiatkowska 2000); however, an insufficient number of controls were included in these studies to determine the frequency of this variant in the general population. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359228) â€šÃ„ÃºWith uncertain significanceâ€šÃ„Ã¹, with a minor allele frequency of 0.000/1 (1000 Genomes Project), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), HGMD, ClinVar database, the BIC database (8 X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (7 X as an unknown variant). The variant was classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports). The variant was identified by the Exome Variant Server project in 1 of 8600 European American alleles (frequency: 0.0001), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The p.Lys3196 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. One study (Santos 2014), found the variant co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant c.8488-1G>A, increasing the likelihood that the p.Lys3196Glu variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

Feb 11, 2003

Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast neoplasm

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.077

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.064

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.030

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.91

Eigen

Benign

-0.29

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.36

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.38

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Benign

0.091

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.92

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.21

Sift

Uncertain

0.020

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.30

T;T

Vest4

0.21

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.16

ClinPred

0.17

GERP RS

3.6

gMVP

0.35

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over