rs806052

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001042413.2(GLIS3):ā€‹c.1270T>Cā€‹(p.Ser424Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1 in 1,585,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 792,208 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 1.0 ( 76007 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 1.0 ( 716201 hom. )

Consequence

GLIS3
NM_001042413.2 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.854
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLIS3 (HGNC:28510): (GLIS family zinc finger 3) This gene is a member of the GLI-similar zinc finger protein family and encodes a nuclear protein with five C2H2-type zinc finger domains. This protein functions as both a repressor and activator of transcription and is specifically involved in the development of pancreatic beta cells, the thyroid, eye, liver and kidney. Mutations in this gene have been associated with neonatal diabetes and congenital hypothyroidism (NDH). Alternatively spliced variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described but the full-length nature of only two have been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=7.210914E-7).
BP6
Variant 9-4118208-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-4118208-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129159.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-4118208-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GLIS3NM_001042413.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1270T>C p.Ser424Pro missense_variant 4/11 ENST00000381971.8 NP_001035878.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GLIS3ENST00000381971.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1270T>C p.Ser424Pro missense_variant 4/115 NM_001042413.2 ENSP00000371398 P1Q8NEA6-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.999
AC:
152053
AN:
152208
Hom.:
75949
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.996
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
1.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
1.00
AC:
202267
AN:
202322
Hom.:
101106
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
111479
AN XY:
111502
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.996
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
1.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
1.00
AC:
1432543
AN:
1432684
Hom.:
716201
Cov.:
71
AF XY:
1.00
AC XY:
709304
AN XY:
709358
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.996
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
1.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.999
AC:
152169
AN:
152324
Hom.:
76007
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.999
AC XY:
74404
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.996
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
1.00
Alfa
AF:
0.999
Hom.:
21662
Bravo
AF:
0.999
TwinsUK
AF:
1.00
AC:
3708
ALSPAC
AF:
1.00
AC:
3854
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.996
AC:
3063
ESP6500EA
AF:
1.00
AC:
6261
ExAC
AF:
0.999
AC:
113004
Asia WGS
AF:
0.999
AC:
3470
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 25, 2016- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 17, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28444304) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Neonatal diabetes mellitus with congenital hypothyroidism Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.058
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
1.6
DANN
Benign
0.31
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.049
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.012
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.14
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
7.2e-7
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.42
N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.42
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.0030
Sift
Benign
0.65
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B
Vest4
0.058
MPC
0.029
ClinPred
0.00091
T
GERP RS
-2.6
Varity_R
0.043
gMVP
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs806052; hg19: chr9-4118208; COSMIC: COSV60924689; COSMIC: COSV60924689; API