rs8067439
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_030665.4(RAI1):c.1992G>A(p.Pro664=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.587 in 1,613,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 291,042 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.57 ( 25281 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.59 ( 265761 hom. )
Consequence
RAI1
NM_030665.4 synonymous
NM_030665.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.42
Genes affected
RAI1 (HGNC:9834): (retinoic acid induced 1) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. It is highly similar to its mouse counterpart and is expressed at high levels mainly in neuronal tissues. The protein encoded by this gene includes a polymorphic polyglutamine tract in the N-terminal domain. Expression of the mouse counterpart in neurons is induced by retinoic acid. This gene is associated with both the severity of the phenotype and the response to medication in schizophrenic patients. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-17794940-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-17794940-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 96179.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-17794940-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.42 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.626 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAI1 | NM_030665.4 | c.1992G>A | p.Pro664= | synonymous_variant | 3/6 | ENST00000353383.6 | NP_109590.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAI1 | ENST00000353383.6 | c.1992G>A | p.Pro664= | synonymous_variant | 3/6 | 1 | NM_030665.4 | ENSP00000323074 | P1 | |
RAI1 | ENST00000395774.1 | c.1992G>A | p.Pro664= | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | 2 | ENSP00000379120 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.565 AC: 85946AN: 152060Hom.: 25254 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
85946
AN:
152060
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.502 AC: 125894AN: 250822Hom.: 35084 AF XY: 0.498 AC XY: 67531AN XY: 135718
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
125894
AN:
250822
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
67531
AN XY:
135718
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.590 AC: 861867AN: 1461296Hom.: 265761 Cov.: 108 AF XY: 0.580 AC XY: 421992AN XY: 726962
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
861867
AN:
1461296
Hom.:
Cov.:
108
AF XY:
AC XY:
421992
AN XY:
726962
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.565 AC: 86029AN: 152178Hom.: 25281 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.554 AC XY: 41192AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
86029
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
41192
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
984
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 22, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Smith-Magenis syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 05, 2017 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 11, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at