rs854772

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):​c.7857G>A​(p.Gly2619Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.581 in 1,569,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 273,422 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.55 ( 23974 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.58 ( 249448 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.101

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO15A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 17-18151915-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18151915-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45761.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.101 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.621 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkc.7857G>A p.Gly2619Gly synonymous_variant Exon 41 of 66 ENST00000647165.2 NP_057323.3 Q9UKN7-1
MYO15AXM_017024715.3 linkc.7860G>A p.Gly2620Gly synonymous_variant Exon 39 of 64 XP_016880204.1
MYO15AXM_017024714.3 linkc.7797G>A p.Gly2599Gly synonymous_variant Exon 38 of 63 XP_016880203.1
LOC124903944XR_007065652.1 linkn.74-9C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkc.7857G>A p.Gly2619Gly synonymous_variant Exon 41 of 66 NM_016239.4 ENSP00000495481.1 Q9UKN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.549
AC:
83400
AN:
151952
Hom.:
23939
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.507
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.577
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.477
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.675
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0902
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.389
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.570
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.649
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.626
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.565
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.510
AC:
91292
AN:
179054
AF XY:
0.511
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.397
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.682
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0916
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.582
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.620
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.571
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.584
AC:
827406
AN:
1416970
Hom.:
249448
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.579
AC XY:
405639
AN XY:
700210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.512
AC:
16834
AN:
32886
American (AMR)
AF:
0.410
AC:
15165
AN:
36964
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.678
AC:
17135
AN:
25256
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.101
AC:
3853
AN:
38122
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.407
AC:
32722
AN:
80414
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.582
AC:
29252
AN:
50298
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.647
AC:
3693
AN:
5710
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.621
AC:
675604
AN:
1088506
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.564
AC:
33148
AN:
58814
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18871
37742
56612
75483
94354
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18078
36156
54234
72312
90390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.549
AC:
83493
AN:
152070
Hom.:
23974
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.537
AC XY:
39943
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.508
AC:
21040
AN:
41456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.477
AC:
7297
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.675
AC:
2341
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0908
AC:
470
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.391
AC:
1883
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.570
AC:
6035
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.646
AC:
190
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.626
AC:
42520
AN:
67950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.564
AC:
1192
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1867
3734
5600
7467
9334
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
708
1416
2124
2832
3540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.605
Hom.:
47408
Bravo
AF:
0.541
Asia WGS
AF:
0.278
AC:
967
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Gly2619Gly in Exon 41 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 46.7% (1513/3240) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Seque ncing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs854772). -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:2
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
0.88
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
0.10
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs854772; hg19: chr17-18055229; COSMIC: COSV52753944; COSMIC: COSV52753944; API