Menu
GeneBe

rs854800

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.10431T>C(p.Tyr3477=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.745 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 450,805 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.78 ( 46714 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.74 ( 404091 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.791
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 17-18173861-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18173861-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45744.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-18173861-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.867 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10431T>C p.Tyr3477= synonymous_variant 65/66 ENST00000647165.2
MYO15AXM_017024715.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.10434T>C p.Tyr3478= synonymous_variant 63/64
MYO15AXM_017024714.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.10371T>C p.Tyr3457= synonymous_variant 62/63

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.10431T>C p.Tyr3477= synonymous_variant 65/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1
ENST00000577847.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.393-1116A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.779
AC:
118554
AN:
152146
Hom.:
46649
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.874
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.657
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.775
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.802
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.641
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.586
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.747
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.775
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.753
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.773
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.734
AC:
181585
AN:
247468
Hom.:
67559
AF XY:
0.724
AC XY:
97479
AN XY:
134716
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.871
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.809
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.639
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.581
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.749
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.746
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.753
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.742
AC:
1083874
AN:
1461556
Hom.:
404091
Cov.:
71
AF XY:
0.736
AC XY:
535235
AN XY:
727092
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.878
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.783
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.808
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.643
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.752
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.748
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.751
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.779
AC:
118680
AN:
152264
Hom.:
46714
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.775
AC XY:
57671
AN XY:
74438
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.874
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.775
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.802
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.641
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.586
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.747
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.753
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.772
Alfa
AF:
0.755
Hom.:
52895
Bravo
AF:
0.787
Asia WGS
AF:
0.607
AC:
2113
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.733
EpiControl
AF:
0.734

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Tyr3477Tyr in Exon 65 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 24.0% (1601/6668) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs854800). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
Cadd
Benign
0.10
Dann
Benign
0.52

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs854800; hg19: chr17-18077175; COSMIC: COSV52753907; COSMIC: COSV52753907; API