rs864309687
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_021954.4(GJA3):c.260C>T(p.Thr87Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T87T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021954.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 14 multiple typesInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- early-onset nuclear cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset posterior polar cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pulverulent cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1460156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726232
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 14 multiple types Pathogenic:1
Variant identified and curated during a GJA3 specific review of the literature in relation to pediatric or congenital cataract. ACMG-AMP criteria applied: PM1, PS4(Supporting), PM2(Supporting), PP1, PP3. Original variant report: PMID:17615540;26694549. The cataract phenotype/s reported for this variant are: Nuclear white spots (peal-box), and Lamellar with anterior/posterior sutural component. Gene review and curation guidelines are outlined in: https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2023.2160320
Developmental cataract Pathogenic:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at