rs864309730
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_172250.3(MMAA):c.653G>A(p.Gly218Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172250.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic aciduria, cblA typeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_172250.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAA | NM_172250.3 | MANE Select | c.653G>A | p.Gly218Glu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | NP_758454.1 | ||
| MMAA | NM_001375644.1 | c.653G>A | p.Gly218Glu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | NP_001362573.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAA | ENST00000649156.2 | MANE Select | c.653G>A | p.Gly218Glu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | ENSP00000497008.1 | ||
| MMAA | ENST00000511969.4 | TSL:1 | n.653G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000427422.1 | |||
| MMAA | ENST00000541599.5 | TSL:5 | c.653G>A | p.Gly218Glu | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | ENSP00000442284.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at