rs864321676
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_178014.4(TUBB):c.43C>A(p.Gln15Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q15H) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178014.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complex cortical dysplasia with other brain malformations 6Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- multiple benign circumferential skin creases on limbs 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
- TUBB3-related tubulinopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Illumina
- multiple benign circumferential skin creases on limbsInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_178014.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.43C>A | p.Gln15Lys | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000339001.7 | P07437 | ||
| TUBB | c.43C>A | p.Gln15Lys | missense | Exon 1 of 3 | ENSP00000610366.1 | ||||
| TUBB | c.43C>A | p.Gln15Lys | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000610365.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at