rs866493167
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The ENST00000234420.11(MSH6):āc.2757A>Cā(p.Glu919Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E919G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000234420.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.2757A>C | p.Glu919Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | ENST00000234420.11 | NP_000170.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.2757A>C | p.Glu919Asp | missense_variant | 4/10 | 1 | NM_000179.3 | ENSP00000234420 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 250956Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135692
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 05, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 20, 2017 | The p.E919D variant (also known as c.2757A>C), located in coding exon 4 of the MSH6 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 2757. The glutamic acid at codon 919 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. In addition, the CoDP in silico tool predicts this alteration to have minor impact on molecular function, with a score of 0.001 (Terui H et al. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013 Apr;20:25). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | May 14, 2024 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with aspartic acid at codon 919 of the MSH6 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MSH6-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/250956 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Endometrial carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 21, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 03, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at