rs875725

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.3345A>G​(p.Glu1115Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0159 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 404 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 120 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.014 ( 284 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.392

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • May-Hegglin anomaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 22-36295645-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36295645-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44558.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.392 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0719 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkc.3345A>G p.Glu1115Glu synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 41 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1 P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkc.3345A>G p.Glu1115Glu synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 41 1 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181.6 P35579-1
MYH9ENST00000685801.1 linkc.3408A>G p.Glu1136Glu synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 42 ENSP00000510688.1 A0A8I5KWT8
MYH9ENST00000459960.1 linkn.554A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 2
MYH9ENST00000691109.1 linkn.3640A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 20 of 35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0310
AC:
4717
AN:
152112
Hom.:
120
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0742
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0250
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0696
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0296
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0168
AC:
4205
AN:
250798
AF XY:
0.0153
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0742
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0235
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0144
AC:
21011
AN:
1461638
Hom.:
284
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0140
AC XY:
10190
AN XY:
727106
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0781
AC:
2614
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0156
AC:
696
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0193
AC:
503
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00936
AC:
807
AN:
86228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0187
AC:
996
AN:
53252
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0780
AC:
450
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0124
AC:
13790
AN:
1111978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0191
AC:
1154
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1224
2448
3671
4895
6119
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
562
1124
1686
2248
2810
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0310
AC:
4722
AN:
152230
Hom.:
120
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0305
AC XY:
2270
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0741
AC:
3078
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0250
AC:
383
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0208
AC:
72
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00808
AC:
39
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0185
AC:
196
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0748
AC:
22
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0127
AC:
865
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0293
AC:
62
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
233
466
698
931
1164
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
50
100
150
200
250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0238
Hom.:
144
Bravo
AF:
0.0329
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0120
AC:
43
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0154
EpiControl
AF:
0.0153

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 15, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Glu1115Glu in Exon 26 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 7.7% (287/3734) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs875725). -

May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome Benign:1
Aug 06, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
7.4
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
0.39
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs875725; hg19: chr22-36691691; API