rs875989939
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4_Moderate
The ENST00000558518.6(LDLR):c.2149G>A(p.Ala717Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,686 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A717G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000558518.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.2149G>A | p.Ala717Thr | missense_variant | 15/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.2149G>A | p.Ala717Thr | missense_variant | 15/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461686Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727148
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cardiovascular Genetics Laboratory, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA - Fiona Stanley Hospital | Sep 03, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, University of São Paulo | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at