rs876657756
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_022124.6:c.6866A>G variant in the CDH23 gene is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of asparagine to serine at amino acid 2289 (p.Asn2289Ser). This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.534, which is neither above nor below the thresholds predicting a damaging or benign impact. This variant was reported in two individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and one individual with postlingual deafness and bilateral vestibular areflexia (LMM unpublished data SCV000271567.2, ARUP Labs unpublished data SCV000602954.2, University Hospital of Geneva unpublished data SCV000494445.1). One individual had a second variant of uncertain significance in trans, and one had a second variant of uncertain significance phase unknown (SCV000602954.2, SCV000494445.1) (Does not meet PM3). In summary, due to limited evidence, this variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel: PM2_supporting. (VCEP specifications version 2.0.0; Dec 21, 2022) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10576816/MONDO:0019497/005
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH23 | NM_022124.6 | c.6866A>G | p.Asn2289Ser | missense_variant | Exon 50 of 70 | ENST00000224721.12 | NP_071407.4 | |
| CDH23 | NM_001171933.1 | c.146A>G | p.Asn49Ser | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 23 | NP_001165404.1 | ||
| CDH23 | NM_001171934.1 | c.146A>G | p.Asn49Ser | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 22 | NP_001165405.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461676Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727128 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 2289 of the CDH23 protein (p.Asn2289Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH23-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 228500). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on CDH23 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Pathogenic:1
This CDH23 heterozygous variant inherited from the mother was found in combination with an another CDH23 heterozygous mutation (presumably inherited from the father, but this could not be ascertained, see above) in a child with bilateral postlingual deafness and bilateral vestibular areflexia -
not specified Uncertain:1
The p.Asn2289Ser variant in CDH23 has not been previously reported in individual s with hearing loss and was absent from large population studies. Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine patho genicity. In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Asn2289Ser variant is u ncertain. -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Uncertain:1
The NM_022124.6:c.6866A>G variant in the CDH23 gene is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of asparagine to serine at amino acid 2289 (p.Asn2289Ser). This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.534, which is neither above nor below the thresholds predicting a damaging or benign impact. This variant was reported in two individuals with sensorineural hearing loss and one individual with postlingual deafness and bilateral vestibular areflexia (LMM unpublished data SCV000271567.2, ARUP Labs unpublished data SCV000602954.2, University Hospital of Geneva unpublished data SCV000494445.1). One individual had a second variant of uncertain significance in trans, and one had a second variant of uncertain significance phase unknown (SCV000602954.2, SCV000494445.1) (Does not meet PM3). In summary, due to limited evidence, this variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel: PM2_supporting. (VCEP specifications version 2.0.0; Dec 21, 2022) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at