rs878853382
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001122769.3(LCA5):c.633_639delAGCTAGA(p.Glu211AspfsTer13) variant causes a frameshift change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,524 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
LCA5
NM_001122769.3 frameshift
NM_001122769.3 frameshift
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.51
Genes affected
LCA5 (HGNC:31923): (lebercilin LCA5) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved in centrosomal or ciliary functions. Mutations in this gene cause Leber congenital amaurosis type V. Alternatively spliced transcript variants are described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
PVS1
Loss of function variant, product undergoes nonsense mediated mRNA decay. LoF is a known mechanism of disease.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
Variant 6-79513292-GTCTAGCT-G is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr6-79513292-GTCTAGCT-G is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 236493.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-79513292-GTCTAGCT-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCA5 | NM_001122769.3 | c.633_639delAGCTAGA | p.Glu211AspfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | ENST00000369846.9 | NP_001116241.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCA5 | ENST00000369846.9 | c.633_639delAGCTAGA | p.Glu211AspfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | 1 | NM_001122769.3 | ENSP00000358861.4 | ||
LCA5 | ENST00000392959.5 | c.633_639delAGCTAGA | p.Glu211AspfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | Exon 4 of 9 | 1 | ENSP00000376686.1 | |||
LCA5 | ENST00000467898.3 | c.633_639delAGCTAGA | p.Glu211AspfsTer13 | frameshift_variant | Exon 3 of 7 | 5 | ENSP00000474463.1 | |||
ENSG00000231533 | ENST00000652956.1 | n.470-13680_470-13674delTAGCTTC | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461524Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727078
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
1461524
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727078
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinal dystrophy Pathogenic:4
Jan 01, 2015
NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research
- -
-
Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester, Central Manchester University Hospitals
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Oct 24, 2018
Blueprint Genetics
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Jan 01, 2023
Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
Apr 01, 2018
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at