rs878853962
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1674C>T(p.Pro558=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000548 in 1,460,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous
NM_000368.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.02
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
?
Variant 9-132905904-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132905904-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 237703.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.02 with no splicing effect.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC1 | NM_000368.5 | c.1674C>T | p.Pro558= | synonymous_variant | 15/23 | ENST00000298552.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC1 | ENST00000298552.9 | c.1674C>T | p.Pro558= | synonymous_variant | 15/23 | 1 | NM_000368.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 250944Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135634
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
250944
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135634
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000548 AC: 8AN: 1460088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000689 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726034
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
1460088
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
726034
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
?
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 22, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 13, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 10, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 14, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at