rs878854518
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1073G>A(p.Arg358Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000384 in 1,561,330 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002691.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | NM_002691.4 | c.1073G>A | p.Arg358Gln | missense_variant | 9/27 | ENST00000440232.7 | NP_002682.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | ENST00000440232.7 | c.1073G>A | p.Arg358Gln | missense_variant | 9/27 | 1 | NM_002691.4 | ENSP00000406046 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000355 AC: 5AN: 1409138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000144 AC XY: 1AN XY: 696090
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74356
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 30, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20951805, 31034466, 29338072) - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 20, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 358 of the POLD1 protein (p.Arg358Gln). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239220). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLD1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 04, 2023 | The p.R358Q variant (also known as c.1073G>A), located in coding exon 8 of the POLD1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1073. The arginine at codon 358 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at