rs878854588
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The ENST00000367975.7(SDHC):c.85C>G(p.Pro29Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,610,688 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P29L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000367975.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHC | NM_003001.5 | c.85C>G | p.Pro29Ala | missense_variant | 3/6 | ENST00000367975.7 | NP_002992.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHC | ENST00000367975.7 | c.85C>G | p.Pro29Ala | missense_variant | 3/6 | 1 | NM_003001.5 | ENSP00000356953 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1458558Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 725862
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor;C1854336:Paragangliomas 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 08, 2023 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 29 of the SDHC protein (p.Pro29Ala). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SDHC-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 239458). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 16, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 31, 2023 | The p.P29A variant (also known as c.85C>G), located in coding exon 3 of the SDHC gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 85. The proline at codon 29 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 10, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at