rs878855248
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_177438.3(DICER1):āc.2133T>Cā(p.His711=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000149 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DICER1
NM_177438.3 synonymous
NM_177438.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.05
Genes affected
DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 14-95111440-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95111440-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 242059.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.05 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 20 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DICER1 | NM_177438.3 | c.2133T>C | p.His711= | synonymous_variant | 14/27 | ENST00000343455.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DICER1 | ENST00000343455.8 | c.2133T>C | p.His711= | synonymous_variant | 14/27 | 1 | NM_177438.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251402Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135870
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251402
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135870
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1461842Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
1461842
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74354
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74354
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
DICER1-related tumor predisposition Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
DICER1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 11, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 17, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 06, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at