rs879254338

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Strong

The NM_000245.4(MET):​c.3488G>A​(p.Gly1163Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1163G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

17
1
1

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.

PM1
In a domain Protein kinase (size 267) in uniprot entity MET_HUMAN there are 41 pathogenic changes around while only 15 benign (73%) in NM_000245.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.985

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3488G>A p.Gly1163Glu missense_variant 17/21 ENST00000397752.8
METNM_001127500.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.3542G>A p.Gly1181Glu missense_variant 17/21
METNM_001324402.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2198G>A p.Gly733Glu missense_variant 16/20
METXM_011516223.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3545G>A p.Gly1182Glu missense_variant 18/22

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3488G>A p.Gly1163Glu missense_variant 17/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1
METENST00000318493.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.3542G>A p.Gly1181Glu missense_variant 17/211 A2P08581-2
METENST00000436117.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.*1093G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 16/201 P08581-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal cell carcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 20, 2015In summary, this is a novel missense change with uncertain impact on protein function. It has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency) and has not been reported in the literature. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This sequence change replaces glycine with glutamic acid at codon 1181 of the MET protein (p.Gly1181Glu). The glycine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glycine and glutamic acid. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
1.0
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.50
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.48
CADD
Pathogenic
32
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.88
D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.2
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
1.0
D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.59
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.91
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.8
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.95
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.96
MutPred
0.92
Loss of catalytic residue at G1163 (P = 0.0297);.;
MVP
0.98
MPC
2.1
ClinPred
1.0
D
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.98
gMVP
0.97

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs879254338; hg19: chr7-116418977; API