rs884662
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1
The NM_001308093.3(GATA4):c.*517T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.31 in 206,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,294 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in Lovd as Benign (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 7716 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 2578 hom. )
Consequence
GATA4
NM_001308093.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_001308093.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.793
Genes affected
GATA4 (HGNC:4173): (GATA binding protein 4) This gene encodes a member of the GATA family of zinc-finger transcription factors. Members of this family recognize the GATA motif which is present in the promoters of many genes. This protein is thought to regulate genes involved in embryogenesis and in myocardial differentiation and function, and is necessary for normal testicular development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with cardiac septal defects. Additionally, alterations in gene expression have been associated with several cancer types. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 8-11758992-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-11758992-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.336 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.316 AC: 47957AN: 151804Hom.: 7704 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
47957
AN:
151804
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.294 AC: 15874AN: 54082Hom.: 2578 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.292 AC XY: 8142AN XY: 27896 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
15874
AN:
54082
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
8142
AN XY:
27896
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
AC:
664
AN:
2034
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
AC:
990
AN:
3722
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
AC:
466
AN:
1218
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
AC:
532
AN:
3512
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
AC:
1643
AN:
6190
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
AC:
539
AN:
1950
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
AC:
10139
AN:
32444
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
AC:
842
AN:
2812
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
521
1041
1562
2082
2603
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.316 AC: 48001AN: 151922Hom.: 7716 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.309 AC XY: 22913AN XY: 74252 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
48001
AN:
151922
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
22913
AN XY:
74252
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
AC:
0.341185
AN:
0.341185
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
AC:
0.271888
AN:
0.271888
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
AC:
0.409746
AN:
0.409746
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
AC:
0.167832
AN:
0.167832
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
AC:
0.267109
AN:
0.267109
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
AC:
0.291801
AN:
0.291801
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
AC:
0.326558
AN:
0.326558
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
AC:
0.309048
AN:
0.309048
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1718
3436
5153
6871
8589
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
478
956
1434
1912
2390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
629
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at